[...] persecuted for questioning some feminist victimization theories. Human-Stupidity posits that women have evolved especially acute language manipulation skills to make up for their physical and economic disadvantages in the EEA. As a result, peer reviewed [...]

Consequences of the “bad boy” and “nice guy” (false) dichotomy:

Women have been and are encouraged to pursue men posessing an exclusive set of traits that has effectively alienated both the effeminate “nice guy” and the characterful “good guys”. They have thrown the baby out with the bathwater not due to natural biology but due to a cultural meme that has elevated what seems to be sensation and emotionalism to divine echelons which are treated with more importance than food, shelter, or clothing. I don’t think feminism is the driving force behind this meme though it may once have been.

Women have been and still are encouraged to pursue “bad boys” encouraged to demonize “nice guy” and all to the exclusion of “good guy” which has resulted in a naive opinion of men that effectively catalyzes feminist interests. Women don’t demonize good guy and will even publicly praise him when prompted but this is only superficial because in terms of social economics good guy ends-up ignored as women devote the majority of their attention to bad boy. This is partly due to the mythical and selfish view that a marriage serves “me” as opposed to the realistic view that marriage requires “my” service. This is also due to a woman’s irrational judgement and fear that all non-badboys are effeminate nice guys. This is fundamentally rooted in an increasingly isolationist non-communal society steeped in a culture of fear that is forced to evaluate individuals entirely upon superficial and visible characteristics and faults. Bad boy is optimized for superficial and visible positive traits and his undesirable faults are well-concealed. The other guys are not and many positive traits remain undiscovered. Apropos, the feminist decries the lack of “real men” in society.

These women incorrectly believe that all men identify with the bad boy charicature in either a set of his positive traits or his negative traits. They aren’t paying attention to anything they don’t have some kind of emotional attachment to. So is it the woman’s fault or the man’s fault? Post hoc ergo propter hoc: this is a circulal cause and consequence evident in a self-fulfilling prophesy demonstrated in sexual selection. Women have the power to choose the good guy and breed more good guys, and by the same token the bad boy can choose to cultivate good guy characteristics in himself and in his offspring. Recent studies in epigenetic heritability show that environmental factors and circumstances have long lasting, permanent and seemingly genetic effects on offspring which only empowers (burdens?) prospective parents with more responsibility. It is also interesting to note by this science that the behavior and choices of individuals have substantial impact on their future offspring long before they have them.

With the aforementioned false binary view of men, the cultural meme states:
- Men are cheaters
- Men are liars
- Men are lazy
- Men are abusive
- Men are stupid
- Men love to party
- Men love to smoke, drink, and do drugs
- Men are indiscriminate in sexual selection
- Men are insensitive
- Men are perverted
- Men are needy
- Men get what they want

…and ignores other demonstrated characteristics such as:
- Men are conscientious
- Men are self-controlled
- Men are self-disciplined
- Men make commitments
- Men make sacrifices
- Men persevere
- Men have social fidelity
- Men are patient
- Men are generous

These women have become addicted to the former set of characteristics in a male and ignore the latter set with respect to sexual selection. The former undermine stability and cultivate chaos and disorder which evoke powerful (and therefore addictive) emotions in the woman. In a culture with excess, the relevant consequences are rarely a factor.

Now we have a woman with a double-minded cognitive dissonance. She simultaneously loaths and worships bad boy while marginalizing edifying gender-neutral characteristics conducive to stability and thriving long-life of which any (good, bad, nice) guy can posess or integrate. This is because, to put it bluntly, those characteristics are boring and since they do not serve the idols of the age, of which I believe to be sensationalism and emotionalism, she has no incentive to invest in them.

Those who embrace these idols of the age will consistently marginalize good guy. If more and more continue to embrace the idols of the age, good guy will suffer attrition as people will become oblivious to his benefits and think there is no incentive to invest in him.

If men and women at least respond with anger towards good guy, it lends him credence and visibility and there is still hope for him. Though the evokation of anger and wrath is a sign of weakness and an unsubstantiated position, good guy threatens the orthodoxy of the age and the consequences could be devastating for him. A part of me sees no conflict more beautiful and blessed than this. Until that time, respond to indifference with invitation and lend a helping hand to the poor fools on autopilot.

[...] is probably why man-hating feminists use female superior verbal manipulation skills to eternally expand the definitions of “rape” and “non-consent,” to con [...]

You do realise that the Powers that Be are running feminism don’t you?

http://www.henrymakow.com

Once you know it is the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers pushing feminism in the west the reason for it’s ‘success’ becomes a lot more obvious.

Karl, western females were already over privileged. That is why men lost power …like straws on the camel’s back–it simply broke in the 18th thru mid 20th cents.

There is no such thing as equal (especially between the genders). So therefore if females were “allowed” to be equal earlier, they simply would have taken over earlier.

You don’t understand ‘dimorphic sexuality’, gender, sex, nature. (And the those that do have lied to you, motivated by politics.)

http://seanmaccloud.blogspot.com/

Again, freedom cult doesn’t–its adherents don’t– understand ‘dimorphic sexuality’, gender, sex, nature. (And the those that do have lied, motivated by politics.)

Timothy,

How did govt’s pit the genders against each other?

How did the men loose the power to prevent govts from conferring privileges on females?

Why do govts/pols want “power”.

Timothy,

How did govt’s pit the genders against each other?

Karl you are wrong. Women received education and where praised to heaven with all the poetry and literature and art. Damn women even worked in the past.

When this happens the next generation of males is less alpha than the previous. Sensing the weakness in the next generation emboldens the females.

This is a load of bs. What really happened, is that the government benefits from the sexes battling against each other, so they allowed cultural marxism to take hold in the form of feminism. Women are more easily manipulated to give away rights and freedoms for privileges.

I’m a male and I don’t like feminism. But I think that if women were treated truelly equally in the first place our society wouldnt be out of balance today. Women were not allowed to grow academically or spiritually. Westerners come from a society where the males did not recognize and the females were not taught or shown the beauty of femininity. They were only shown that they were of little value and males were of high value. This caused the death of femininity in a society where the only perceived value were masculine traits. Theres no one to blame except western society as a whole. Feminism used to bother me but hey theres a shitload of women in the world who arent of the western culture. I know how to appreciate femininity.