"To Catch a Predator" witch hunt by NBC Dateline & "Perverted Justice"" was a successful TV series. Chris Hansen enticed many people (overwhelmingly men) to meet with female and men teen "jail bait" and to get them violently arrested by Swat. To understand the irony of the following spoof you might want to first read "To Catch a Predator" witch hunt by NBC Dateline & "Perverted Justice"".

To Catch a Predator — Hot for Teacher (Video)

Some men’s rights proponents (the antifeminist) would disagree here. They think women "sex offenders" like the ones above should not be cut any slack, if men in the same situation get humiliatingly arrested. We actually agree: Human Stupidity, in its 50 post series about Teenage Sexuality suggested to invert the double standard. Girls mature faster and thus need less protection from sex (if they need any protection at all). Ancient wisdom of the old knew this: all over the world, minimum marriage age for girls was lower then for boys.

Don’t miss the YouTube Spoof of "Catch a Predator": Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment, a hilarious spoof of a healthy male lusting after willing 17 year old pussy.

Adult Child Sex

Adult child sex is a very different issue. Like the following spoof, we take issue with modern pedo-hysteria. It is generally assumed that the average adult male is a danger to pre-pubescent children. We believe that the vast majority of normal males have no sexual interest whatsoever in pre-pubescent children.

Pedophile hunters are more dangerous then most pedophiles (who might feel an attraction without the need of acting it out).

• Dangerous pedophile vigilantes cheer German Dad, 47, for castrating the boyfriend, 57, of his 17-year-old daughter

Paedogeddon Video

The word "pedophile" has been distorted on purpose. We are interested in discussing post-pubescent adolescent sexuality. 

• What is a Pedophile? Hebephile, Ephebophile, Teleiophile, Infantophile 

Brass Eye paedophile blasted into space (Video)

We leave the discussion of child sex to nambla.org. We have no interest in defending legalization of adult child sex.

But, The cult of childhood made an interesting point that in ancient Greece, the cradle of Western civilization, adult men had sex with fairly young boys and we are not aware of reports of severe damage to ancient youth. This is consistent with the findings of the Rind Study. 

The Pedo-Files – Brass Eye (Video)

But, again, we are not interested in defending adult-child sexuality. But we think that the hysteria and penalties are way overblown (Judge Weinstein). There seem to be scientific findings that the seemingly unnatural adult-child sexuality might be harmless, or much less damaging then we are made to believe (Rind Study) and that the availability of child porn can help reduce actual child abuse (Milton Diamond). 

We have no special interest in defending legalization of adult-child sexuality. But the above findings further bolster our opinion that sex between adults and *consenting post-pubertal teenage adolescents is harmless enough to be decriminalized.  Yes, fathers and mothers should have a say, but the government has more pressing safety and crime issues to deal with then protecting post-pubertal adolescents against their own consensual sex acts.

Sexuality between adolescent or child peers

Criminalization of sexuality between adolescents and between children of similar age might be unwise, but really should not be a criminal issue.  Government, police and judges should not be concerned with kids playing doctor. Our 50 posts about Teenage Sexuality deal with this over and over, how children get victimized by adults’ stupid sexuality laws.

• Teenage sexuality: The immense complexity of local laws, state lines and international travel

Romeo and Juliet laws of course raise questions of age discrimination. They raise the question why adolescent girls should be forced to act out their sexuality with even more immature adolescent boys and be deprived of the option to choose older, more mature men.

• In  a normal non-rape context, the receiving person might be asked to return the money. But never would he be jailed for robbery for accepting money from a lightly drunk stranger. Much less if she complained 6 months after the fact.

Officer: You are very brave for coming forward. If you were drunk and driving, you would be arrested, but since you were just drunk and stupid, you’re a poor helpless victim. What monster could have done this to you?

Woman: His name is Joe Smith.

Officer: Well, we will go to his place of employment and very loudly announce that he is under arrest for such a terrible crime. He will probably lose his job just due to the accusation. If he is well known, even though he has not yet been tried, we will plaster his face over all newspapers and news channels. Luckily our society is one which no longer believes that "innocent until proven guilty" hogwash, we now have a "let’s hang him just to be safe" approach to crime. He will probably receive death threats, abuse from strangers in public, and may even be forced to move over this allegation.

Woman: Wow, that is great for revenge. What about the trial?

Officer: Even though we have no evidence other than your accusation, we will charge him, as no further evidence is needed thanks to new laws. If he takes it to trial, he will probably spend 15 years in prison, and will be the brunt of abuse of other inmates. Most likely however, the 15 year sentence will scare him enough that he will plead out. He will be in prison for 4-10 years, then when he get out and be on a public registry. If he has children he may never see them again. He will forever be ridiculed by the public and in a sense be a pariah.

Woman: And if after he has spent 7 years in prison, you find out I lied?

Officer: The DA will probably not even file charges, unless there is clear proof you knowingly and maliciously falsely accused the person. This is almost impossible, because you filed charges 6 months after the crime.  If there is absolutely convincing proof, or your confession, you will have to pay a $150 fine. If you have bad luck, we will sentence you to a year probation. We will try to keep it quiet, otherwise other mugging victims may not come forward. He may or may not be released. It helps us if he’s not because now our D.A. and police department can run around and show everyone that we’re doing a great job getting another violent, misanthropic criminal off of the street. It’s win win for everyone, and if he complains about how his life is ruined, he should just man up and get over it.

Woman: Oh no! But what happens if I want to report another mugging after you find out I have been lying?

Officer: Thanks to mugging shield laws, it can never be brought up at trial, you can put as many men in prison as you like.

Woman: Well, if that’s the case, then I want to report another mugging. Bob Johnson, the cab driver, had mugged me a few nights ago. I know that he had me arrested because I had taken the ride and didn’t have any money to pay him, but it was really because he mugged me.

Officer: We will drop all charges against you and arrest Bob Johnson immediately.

Woman: A year ago I reported a (real) robbery. I had been walking around in a bad neighborhood, flashing my money around and someone threatened me with a knife and took my money. Police officer Miller took my report and actually brought the case to trial. But Miller also also told me that it is unwise to walk around drunk flashing cash at night in a bad neighborhood. That is victim blaming.  What sort of world is this where a woman can’t even run around drunk flashing all of his cash and become a victim of unwanted attention?

Officer: We will bring disciplinary charges against officer Miller. He will be dismissed and officially publicly reprimanded by the governor and ridiculed by the press. Rights groups will also initiate "Reclaim the night" money-slut walks in gang area @2am. You don’t deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home, and don’t have to stay sober, to avoid being victimized.

• This is in reference to the poor police officer who sparked the slut walks. He had recommended, as a precaution against rape, that women should use common sense and not walk around drunk in provocative clothing.

Statutory mugging (invalid consent)

Woman: Now I remember, 25 years ago, when I was 15, I bought a used bicycle from a neighborhood boy, John. I gave him 50 dollars for it. Can I also report him for mugging?

Officer: Of course, 15 year olds can not consent to buying bicycles. Therefore your consent is invalid and it was mugging. We will have him arrested immediately. If you can not convince a jury of the facts, then he will be released from jail after 6 months. Otherwise he will get 10 years or more.

Woman: After 3 months, still 15 years old, I sold the bike, at a profit, to another neighborhood boy, Frank, also 15 years old. Can Frank accuse me of mugging?

Officer: Don’t worry. You can accuse Frank of bike robbery. As a minor you are unable to consent to selling a bicycle. Men are always to blame. In California, there are no Romeo and Juliet laws that would exempt minors from engaging in minor exchanges and business dealings. You might get a small fine (because you are a woman), but he will go to prison for 10 years.

Woman: The same penalty as the guy who robbed me at knife point?

Officer: There is no difference if the neighborhood boy bought a bicycle from you or if he took it away from you forcibly.  This has been confirmed by our Vice President Joe Biden. Receiving money given voluntarily by a tipsy woman, selling a bicycle to a minor, or robbing at knife point, are all the same crime and carry the same penalty. There are even activists who think that physicians who perform emergency procedures in insensitive ways should be imprisoned.

All these laws are to make sure that not one single mugger goes unpunished. It is also to encourage reporting of muggings, even after 47 years. One in two women will be mugged in her life time. One in four will be mugged in college, the most dangerous place to be mugged.

The Obama administration requires Colleges to prosecute men accused of mugging and convict them by the preponderance of evidence criterion. This has reduced the underreporting of muggings.

As an unexpected side effect, it also reduced false rape accusations. It is actually easier and less embarrassing now to file a false mugging accusation to get even.

Woman: What if I just bought the man a drink, while I was drunk myself?

Officer: You were taken advantage of. It does not matter what dollar amount. Both the man who accepted the drink and the bartender are guilty of mugging. 

Mugging pictures

Woman: My uncle Joe once filmed me, at 6 years of age, buying a tricycle in the toy store

Officer: You were robbed of your pocket money by an toy store sales person? A 6 year old can not consent to paying a tricycle. Worse, the crime was recorded on film? This is production of child mugging pornography. The punishment for production, possession or distribution of such photos is higher then the punishment for mugging itself.

This is to protect children from the child mugging photo industry, a multi billion illicit business that victimizes millions of children.

Baby’s  consent to unhealthy food

Woman: My mother was an alcoholic when she was pregnant with me. This is why I have nervous problems and suffer from seizures.

Officer: Well, you did not complain. So you consented to your mother’s alcohol habits while you were in the womb.

Woman: During the first 8 years of my life, my mother gave me only hamburgers and french fries and never let me play outside. This is why I weigh 300 pounds, have diabetes and had 3 heart attacks.

Officer: Did you fight your mother? Refuse the fries? Obviously you consented, when you were 4 years old, so there is no legal problem.

Credits

This is a modified version of A much more accurate rape analogy which  was (negatively) inspired by this and this. The red text is solely ours, the black text is taken from the valued reddit post.

Then, in a TV talk show, a group of men makes fun of the story. Isn’t it hilarious?  The spectators have hearty laughs and giggles.  Of course, it is not the same as cutting off a man’s penis, because a penis is softer then a woman’s breast. One moderate man actually says she did not deserve it, but he can think of a woman’s crime where he would do just the same.

If a woman divorced him, got 50% of his salary  (before taxes) and gots him jailed for non-payment. Then he would discover he was cuckolded, the child was not his kid, and the courts still held him responsible for payment because he had acted as a good father and he was too trusting to do a DNA test early enough. Then the rage is understandable and she really deserves it. She still will recover and can take care of the bastard child.

Participants and audience laugh and giggle. They all agree, full of understanding.

He realized every man’s secret dream. All men secretly dream of sexually mutilating a woman, to teach her a lesson.

I just inverted the sexes, for demonstration purposes.

Men are not that vile. Never ever would a male talk show host, audience, guests condone such barbarity against women, or make fun of it.  Only women are that mean, violent and vengeful to joke and make fun of male mutilation!  It is the secret fantasy of many women to cut off a man’s penis. (People say this statement is misogynistic. I did not make this up, watch the video to believe that those woman have a good time joking about this abuse of a man)

Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband’s penis and later demanded and got an excuse. Of course, she got no jail sentence for that. She was justified because he was a philanderer and cheated. She had real fan clubs. Go ahead and google "Lorena Bobbitt jokes".  John Waine Bobbitt never went as far as many women to, he never got a baby from a mistress, much less made his wife pay and care for a baby that was not hers. He just, allegedly, cheated.  Amazingly his penis was found and re-attached.

Catherine Kieu mutilates husband | YouTube

Catherine Kieu, 48 learned from Lorena’s mistake. Her husband would not get his penis back. She planned meticulously. She drugged him first, tied him up. Made sure he was awake to see and feel the punishment he deserved. After cutting off the penis, she ground it up with the sink’s electric garbage disposal. So she could be sure he never will use it again. A wonder she did not grind it while it was still attached. Or put it through a meat grinder, so he could look at it afterwards? She left him tied up. It is amazing that he did not bleed to death. She was very nice to call police, so after a long delay he finally got medical attention and would stay alive, so he could live the rest of his life without a penis and ponder what he did wrong. He must have done something to hurt her, make her angry, to deserve it.

The tax payer is paying her lawyer. I am sure he will plead battered woman syndrome, not guilty for reasons of insanity. After all, Lorena Bobbitt got away without punishment.

It is not clear if she destroyed his testicles, too. In that case, our hero would also have to extract the woman’s ovaries, to make the above example equal to Caterine’s crime.

On Monday night, police say Kieu spiked a meal and served it to the victim.

The 60-year-old man started to feel sick and went to lie down, then awoke tied to the bed as Kieu attacked him with a 10-inch kitchen knife, police said.

She then put the penis down a garbage disposal, police said.

"It’s hard to believe what would motivate a person to do this sort of thing," the district attorney’s chief of staff, Susan Kang Schroeder, said outside court. "It’s one of the worst things you could do to a person short of killing him."

Newly appointed defense attorney Lee Gabriel made no public statement after the hearing.

Police did not release the victim’s name. He underwent surgery and was listed in good condition at University of California at Irvine Medical Center, hospital spokesman John Murray said.

Murray declined to say whether the penis was reattached or provide any additional details about the victim’s condition, citing patient privacy laws.

Kieu was charged with one felony count of torture, one felony count of aggravated mayhem and sentencing enhancements for great bodily injury and personal use of a knife. If convicted of all counts, she could face life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Garden Grove Police Lt. Jeff Nightengale said Kieu called police Monday night to report a medical emergency and told arriving officers "he deserved it" before pointing to the room where the victim was found bleeding profusely. She was taken into custody without incident and refused to talk to officers further. Daily News

Men are abused and repressed from cradle to grave

We live in a world where men can be killed and mutilated with impunity. Where man lost their human rights and go to debtor’s prison for not paying child support, even for a cuckold child. Where women get quota in politics and CEO ranks, but not in jail or on death row. Where women got equal rights in votes but not in the draft. Where boys are discriminated from cradle to grave. Female genital mutilation is a crime, but many boys get circumcised with no medical reason and with no anesthesia. Young male children get arrested for sexual harassment, school is run by women and so adapted to girls that now 57% of bachelors degrees go to women. Finally, women work less and retire earlier then men. So women receive many more years of retirement benefits. Men pay for woman’s retirement benefits. Read Angry Harry. Become active. Embrace radical masculism to oppose oppressive radical feminism.

Or at least violation of the "half age plus 6 years" rule should be made a felony. So 84 year old Hugh Hefner could not abuse any woman younger then 84/2 + 6 = 42 + 6 = 48 years, or would be punished for statutory rape of a 47 year old, incapable of consenting to sex with an old geezer like Hugh Hefner. He should be in jail for objectifying women in Playboy Magazine, anyway.

Our sex offender laws are not being enforced. Anyone that has illicit sex with rapes an under 18 y old minor in California needs to get tried and arrested. Yes, that includes minors too, in California two 17 year olds are not allowed to have sex with each other. That, finally, would allow us to imprison a few million men in California, and only a few women (because in couples, men tend to be the older one of the two).

He 84 y, she 24 y (60 years age difference)

Love really must be blind — at least, for 84-year-old Hugh Hefner’s new twenty-something fiancé. Playboy Playmate Crystal Harris, 24, told ‘Entertainment Tonight’ she hardly recognizes the 60-year age gap between herself and her husband-to-be.
‘I don’t notice the age difference with Hef at all,’ Harris said. ‘If anything, I have to keep up with him!’ Harris said Hef’s energy level often surpasses the blond bombshell, who was Playboy Playmate of the Month in December 2009 NY Daily News

But the 83-year-old Playboy publisher took his tried-and-true May-December romance to a whole new level when he started dating then-19-year-old twins Kristina and Karissa Shannon, in 2008 [83-19= 64 years difference] The girls went on to star in ‘The Girls Next Door,’ but the media mogul and the Shannon twins parted ways in early 2010, so Hef could focus on his other blond girlfriend, 23-year-old Crystal Harris.

Don’t miss our articles on

• Actor Dough Hutchinson (51) married Courtney Alexis Stodden, 16 year old child. We suspect he is a child rapist.

• Michel Temer (70), new Vice-President of Brazil was 63 when he married Marcela Temer at age 20. Borderline Pedophilia or healthy human sexuality?

Women Cougars marrying young men is sexual liberation

When a repressed class violates old norms and robs the cradle, then this is sexual liberation, very different from horny perverted men marrying young women. Go girl, liberate yourself and all women from age restrictions!

When Madonna and her ten-years-younger husband, Guy Ritchie, called it quits in 2008, the eternally youthful material girl wasted no time rebounding with an even younger boy-toy. Madge started dating 23- year-old Brazilian model Jesus Luz in 2009, and the pair has been spotted all over the globe since.
Ick Factor: Jesus’ mother is 14 years younger than Madonna.  NY Daily News

The Cougar queen

Hulk Hogan’s ex-wife, Linda Bollea, takes the cake as the cougar queen. Linda, 51, and her 21-year-old boyfriend Charley Hill, started dating when he was only 19! But the duo’s matching platinum ‘dos aren’t the freakiest thing about this relationship …
Ick Factor: The Hogan kids, Brooke and Nick, are 21 and 19, respectively. In fact, Charley is a former classmate of Brooke’s.

Read more: NY Daily News

Gay May December is chique!

Equally, the repressed class "gay men" can do what creepy heterosexual men should never do.

So what’s Calvin Klein’s hottest accessory? It’s got to be his 20-year-old partner, Nick Gruber. The designer and the model/actor make quite the pair, despite the fact that Klein is 67-years-young.

Read more NY Daily News

35 year age difference. With an adopted step daughter.

They only started their affair when she was 22. The old pervert must have groomed her when she was younger. Maybe he already adopted her with such ill intent. All men are rapists and perverts. She got brain-washed to accept such an age difference. We can not understand why she would pick such an old man, so it must be rape. [We are kidding, in case you don't get the joke]

In 2005, the notoriously private Woody Allen finally discussed his scandalous marriage to Soon-Yi Previn. Despite never getting married, the now 74-year-old filmmaker and actress Mia Farrow were together for twelve years, had one biological child and adopted two children together, one of whom was Soon-Yi. The pair split in 1992 after Farrow discovered Allen, then 56, and Previn, then 22, were having an affair.
Despite a 35-year age difference, the couple have been together ever since, tying the knot in 1997.

Read more: NY Daily News

This money-slut walk is in response to a police recommendation, not to carry large amounts of cash. We object to such victim blaming. The money is ours. We can carry it wherever we want. No matter if we are drunk or not.

These money-slut walkers are simple fighting for their right show off their money	These ‘slut walk’ women are simply fighting for their right to be dirty
Its my hot money, I do what I want Men and women march through East Los Angeles high crime neighborhood during the money-slut walk, which organizers described as a demonstration against those who blame the victims of robberies.	Women march through downtown Boston during the ‘SlutWalk’ in Boston, which organizers described as a demonstration against those who blame the victims of sex crimes
True liberation is men or women carrying the cash they want and abandon credit cards and modesty	True liberation is women wearing what they like and abandoning the Hoover.

In this Video, the great Steven Pinker how and why we convey innuendos instead of overt clear language.  Why do we use veiled hidden messages behind our words. The topic is  clarified with nice enlightening drawings by rsa-animate. Must see!

I leave it to the watcher, what this has to do with our favorite topics like dishonesty, unconsciousness,hypocrisy …

"Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."                   (Adapted freely from protectchildren.ca/app/en/mandatory

.

Perverts take ultrasound photos of unborn babies and  distribute them on the internet. source  But does it harm nobody? Weinstein’s critics argue that merely “viewing” unborn child porn does real harm to unborn kids by perpetuating a $3 billion annual market. The Justice Department estimates that in creating their product, unborn child pornographers have abused 1 million unborn kids in the United States. And some studies suggest that between 30 and 50 percent of viewers of unborn child porn also molest a child.     (freely adapted from theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/jack-weinstein/8273/)

Fetuses engaging in indecent touching. Perverts owning such photos deserve to be raped in jail forever. This picture would be rated 7 on the 10 point Copine child pornography scale: Pictures that depict touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by a child, not involving an adult. The fetuses also should be arrested at birth:  handcuffed, jailed, and be registered as sex offenders for life.

It is important to realize that these images are crime scene photos – they are a permanent record of the abuse of an unborn child. The lives of the unborn children featured in these illegal images and videos are forever altered. Once these images are on the Internet, they are irretrievable and can continue to circulate forever. The unborn child is revictimized as the images are viewed again and again.         (adapted freely from missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?PageId=1504)     “He didn’t intend to hurt anyone. However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.”  thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9019133.html

Technology has made it possible to have unborn porn. Source: uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Child_porn I thank Uncycolpedia for their child porn persiflage which gave me inspiration for this article

Children of 17 years, 12 years, 5 years, 1 year, 1 month of age are all protected strict laws from being abused  by viewers of sexual erotic photos and videos. Owning such photos of children and looking at such photos and videos is child abuse.

But why this 0-18 year age limit? The 18 year cutoff rate already is getting softened. Europe and Australia already punish the possession of depictions of "aparently underage" for 22 year old women in pony tails that look as if they were 17 years old. Thus  the law now protects young looking 22 year old women from child abuse. (see 17 year old "children"?)

Now we need to work on the other end of the age range. Who says that the lower age limit  for child pornography prosecutions has to be zero year old new borns? Embryos and fetuses need protection against abuse and rape, too. Right from conception, when human life is created.

Unborn-child-porn leads to 100 000′s child killings

Often such ultrasound photos are the first step in the monstrous killing of unborn babies. Most abortionists demand ultrasound photos of the unborn child before killing it.  Or even with mothers who did not plan to kill the unborn child, ultrasound pictures discover a problem with the child and thus cause her to decide to kill the innocent unborn child.

And these child killings feed the market for mutilated dead-fetus-porn (dead-unborn-child-porn)

Mutilated dead unborn-child-porn (mutilated fetus porn)

Warning: fairly gruesome photos follow. Dead-unborn-child-porn, mainly from "pro-life" organizations.

Warning: very graphic pictures. These fotos are so gruesome, we will not endeavour to publish them. Many are clearly unborn-child=porn, as the genitals are obscenely exposed. We only publish censored blacked-out pixelated versions. Click to see the uncensored mutilated dead unborn-child-porn. 

Dead fetuses in indecent poses with genitals exposed

There are people who produce, collect, distribute depictions of dead and mutilated unborn children. Pedophiles know no bounds.

Obviously people getting their kicks from watching these photos. Embryos in indecent position with genitals clearly visible. There is an entire web site dedicated to such cruelty. Remember: each time a mutilated embryo is being looked at, it is suffering mutilation again!

• Unborn child with obscenely opened legs and clearly visible genitals
• Dead fetus with in indecent position showing genitals
• Mutilated fetus with legs opened indecently
• Indecent exposure of the behind of an aborted fetus

Rumors are these unborn child pedophiles (also perversely called pro-life) rummage in garbage bins to find life-less victims to photograph.

Some 300, 000 children a year are taken from their wombs because of neglect and abuse. The most horrific crime that can done to an unborn child is sexual abuse. The ridiculous idea is that you can stop abuse by allowing digital unborn child porn. I was a real unborn child exposed to unborn child pornography and it almost killed me.

[...] Unborn child pornography is one of the most overlooked forms of unborn child abuse that exists. This is due in part to the misconception that these victims are willing participants.

[...] The effects of pornography on unborn children specifically and society as a whole are quite obvious. Almost all agree, even the researchers from this study, that in the case of unborn child pornography, where a real unborn child is videotaped or photographed there is always a victim.

Most would also agree the effects are similar for the victims whose pictures have been altered and their face is superimposed on an adult body.        (Freely adapted after MICHAEL REAGAN: Child Porn Is Child Abuse. I Know Because It Happened to Me)

Dead fetus porn (dead-unborn-child-pornography)

Dead fetuses are seen all over the internet! Just because they did not die a violent death by the hand of man does not mean they are not victims.

A six week embryonic age or eight week gestational age intact Embryo, found ia Ruptured Ectopic pregnancy case. source

Victim of a spontaneous abortion, in indecent position with legs wide open. Each time this photo gets looked at, the fetus gets abused again. A complete spontaneous abortion at about 6 weeks from conception, i.e. 8 weeks    source

Twin unborn child pornography

Twin fetuses, of same sex of of opposite sex, confined into a small space.  

Two fetuses together. Why would anyone want to look at such photos?

Two clearly underage fetuses together in close contact. A pedophile’s fantasy

.

Human-Stupidity.com Analysis

• The anti child porn crusaders give the (absurd) impression that the average man is prone to get sexually excited by depictions of pre-pubertal children and babies. Men can get in trouble for photographing their own child.
• The anti child porn crusaders suggest that the prohibition of such photos protects children from rape and abuse. 
  • it seems the opposite is the case: Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii). In other words, the entire child pornography craze probably backfires, and actually increase violent rapes and abuse of children.
  • These photos of adolescent and child nudity are so dangerous, we even  sacrifice airline safety due to insane child porn laws, to make sure nobody can see the outlines of an adolescent body on an airport scanner’s screen.
  • It is perfectly legal to show, for profit, on mainstream TV movies of children getting humiliated in fights, beaten to death, stoned to death,

• Child porn laws are dangerous in many ways: Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
• so human-stupidity.com just extends that allegation that most men are prone to attraction  and sexual activity with pre-pubescent children to the equally preposterous allegation that lots of men would get sexually excited by nudity of unborn fetuses
• We understand that some people find it perverse, that we make jokes about "child pornography"
  • Some misunderstanding stems from the perverse fact that due to absurd alteration of our vocabulary,  "Children" can be 17 years old (17 year old "children"? )and "pornography" can be nude photos or even videos of dressed girls in Leotard dancing provocatively. (Knox vs. United States). So Child pornography spans the gamut of 15 year old girls in Leotards dancing provocatively, to 17 year olds photographing themselves in the nude,  to 3 year olds getting violently penetrated and mistreated
  • we think John Wayne Bobbitt dick cutting jokes are tasteless ** “I remember waking up in a pool of blood, with my penis missing, and my first thought was, ‘Y’know, this would make a really amusing stand-up comedy routine.’”…”They told me they were going to re-attach my penis using Micro-Surgery. I was humiliated. I wanted Jumbo-Surgery”… “My medical and attorney bills are over $750,000. Not to brag, but that’s $95,000 per inch”…
  • We think that most literature and legislation child porn sound like bad jokes ( Voodoo science of child pornography laws). Most of the texts from this article were directly adapted from real texts for child pornography persecution apologists.
  • We are outraged that thousands of upstanding normal men are in jail for decades, for possession of so called "child porn", most of which is neither porn nor involves what normal people would call children.
  • But it is not clear to us, why even mere possession of real porn involving real children should be such a terrible crime deserving higher prison terms then the actual act of child abuse.
  • This is shown by the following macabre child-porn-joke. Though somewhat tasteless, we believe it has a deeper meaning:

After being found guilty of the abduction, torture, sexual abuse and then murder of one child, I would have thought now being caught wanking over child porn was demonstrating an improvement in behaviour.  sickipedia.org/getjokes/similar/489667

In case you don’t get the deep meaning of the joke

• according to Dr. Diamond’s research, child porn reduces child abuse crimes exactly because pedophiles get an outlet for their sexual drive.
• even judges protest the insane sentencing laws in the US that punish possession of child porn with higher mandatory jail sentences then for actual child abuse.

Related articles