Wenn "Vergewaltigung" ist keine Vergewaltigung. Sprachmißbrauch des Worts "Vergewaltigung"


Share

, , , ,

  1. #1 von admin am 12:45 - 12:45

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    There has been a lengthy discussion on reddit, worth reading. Please continue the discussion here

    http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cw549/when_a_rape_is_not_a_rape_the_abuse_of_the_word/
    ================================
    I will make a few exerpts from Reddit here
    ===========================
    Keyaira14

    No, the point was actually I believe perfectly made. Here the person discusses the fact that rape is now a term given to all kinds of offenses, wether or not rape as it is usually understood (forced penetration etc.) was involved. And by that it makes the point that it also diminishes the meaning of the word rape. The fact is that, knowing that “rape” could be almost anything, one might read of a rape and think it very plausible that in fact there was no “true” rape, but a lesser offense. And the possible error made here makes the point all the more valid! When one reads “rape of a 15 years old by a 35 years old” and concludes that it might well have been the old man seducing the girl and then being convicted of rape, while in fact it WAS a “true” rape, I think it proves beyond ANY reasonable doubt that, because of it’s overuse, rape lost a great part of it’s meaning.

  2. #2 von admin am 12:50 - 12:50

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    kasumi1190

    I have no sympathy for anyone who acts out on pedophilia. I am even open enough to understand some people have these sexual fantasies, and I would even go so far to say it’s not really even a sickness but just simply another sexual fetish. It is unfortunately one of those things you can’t act out without harming another person. If someone molests a child like that, who cares whether there was actual penetration or not? You think any less harm is done to a child because of this? I understand the word is actually being slightly being misused from it’s definition, but who the fuck really cares in this instance.

    I however agree that it should be changed for statutory rape, because 9/10 it’s just consensual sex with someone who is usually barely even a minor. But pedophile cases, who really has enough sympathy for them to argue over this? Who cares?
    ** another comment taken from http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cw549/when_a_rape_is_not_a_rape_the_abuse_of_the_word/

  3. #3 von admin am 12:53 - 12:53

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    miketheexpert

    Didn’t read the article, but I was acussed of rape two times in my life. The first was a drunk girl that I knew, and she got really drunk, hotnhorney one night. I told her that I was putting her in my bed, and she should wake my up on the couch the next morning, instead, she pulls me into bed, jumps on top of me, thrusting her tits in my face, and pulled my pants down, after which I did hers, and we ‘tried’ to have sex, except she was soooooo dry, that it never happened.

    The next time was a girlfriend that somehow scored some crack and so so fucked up, she opened the front door and screemed ‘rape’. I left my house, made a huge scratch on the back of my neck, and when the cops arrived, they saw the scratch and said, “she was obviously the aggressor”. I never did anything wrong with either one… but the first one, she knew all my friends and then I lost them just as quick. About 5 years later, she confessed that I didn’t rape her, but at that time, my friends were already gone.

    **** another comment from reddit http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cw549/when_a_rape_is_not_a_rape_the_abuse_of_the_word/

  4. #4 von admin am 19:51 - 19:51

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I have added into the text: About rape by broken marriage vow in India, about Whoppi Goldberg’s rape-rape, …

    Whoppi Goldberg differentiates “rape-rape” and non-violent so called “rape”

    Hollywood has rallied behind Roman Polanski after his arrest in Switzerland over the weekend, with the actor Whoopi Goldberg suggesting that whatever he was guilty of it wasn’t “rape-rape”.

    As a guest on The View chatshow on US television, she said: “I know it wasn’t rape-rape. It was something else but I don’t believe it was rape-rape. He went to jail and and when they let him out he was like, ‘You know what, this guy’s going to give me a hundred years in jail. I’m not staying.’ So that’s why he left.”

    Polanski was not guilty of ‘rape-rape’, says Whoopi Goldberg

  5. #5 von admin am 19:56 - 19:56

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    The upshot of this narrow, archaic definition is that many rapes are excluded from the [FBI's annual crime] statistics — including forced anal sex and/or oral sex, vaginal or anal fisting, rape with an object (even if serious injuries result), and other injurious and degrading sexual assaults that would be considered rape by any rational adult.

    A press release from the foundation added: “It also excludes statutory rape and omits rape by men against men and any rape by a woman. Moreover, this out-dated definition of rape excludes the use of drugs or alcohol to subdue a victim, a common tactic used today.” We aren’t talking about a minor quibble over language; these are critical omissions that cast this week’s finding that the rape rate is declining in a much less encouraging light.

    http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/09/14/rape_hearing

    We are all in favor of clarity. Anal rape, male on male rape should be included. Even statutory rape, if someone wants to add it, provided it does not get mixed up in general rape numbers but as a separate category.

    We do not want to link to change.org sucks, but there are some intelligent commentators in this post, that make it worth reading:
    womensrights.change.org/blog/view/the_fbis_shockingly_narrow_definition_of_rape

  6. #6 von admin am 20:11 - 20:11

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    you know i feel bad about this law..i was days away from being 16 and was with a guy that was 24, and i left him or we just stopped talking i cant really remember anymore..but i remeber going off with him one day and my parents wanted me to stay at home..but i left with him. and the police came to the his house, and threatened him..i think thats why we stopped talking..anyways a few days later he get’s arrested, and i looked at his booking charges on the internet, and it’s horrible he’s still in jail after 2 years and they still havent went to court, but i know it was child molestation, sodomy, distribution of alchol to a minor,aggravated child molestation, sexual battery. I will admit i was very seductive, and i looked 20 and i had lied about my age in the beggining. i just dont understand how the law can be so ludacris.
    http://apublicdefender.com/2007/10/05/why-i-hate-statutory-rape-laws/#comment-58005

    Interesting comment. An example of a “victim” that did not want to be protected by the law.

  7. #7 von Devils Advocate am 05:47 - 05:47

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Cover Stories Behavior: When Is It RAPE? Interesting older Time Magazine article analysing “rape”. I don’t agree with the overly feminist attitude, but it is a good overview

    According to Sharia rape in marriage is not possible This is worth analyzing. Obvious violent rape in marriage, with proof, should be punished. But unprovem rape allegations by a wife should be seen with great suspicion. And if there is no sex in marriage, maybe they should not be married but divorce.

    feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/10/16/when-is-rape-at-gunpoint-not-rape-when-its-theft-of-services/ this is a shocking story about a gang rape of a prostitute, which was considered “theft of service” and not rape. But the link to the original source is dead, so it looks like a feminist hoax.

(wird nicht veröffentlicht)


Switch to our mobile site