Leider ist der Eintrag nur auf English verfügbar.
Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Dummheit-Dogmen
- Assisted Suicide & Right to die
- Irrationale Drogenpolitik
- Kinderpornografie-Hexenjagd
- Kreationismus
- Men's Rights & Feminism
- Menschenrechte
- Political correctness
- Prostitution
- Rassen & Intelligenz
- Religion & Atheism
- Sexualität Minderjähriger
- Umgangsregeln – Gewohnheiten
- Ungesunde Lebensweise
- Verbrechen ohne Opfer
- Vorbildliche Lösungen
- Wirtschaft
- Wissenschaftsirrtümer
- Wissenschaft
- Drogen
- Humor
- Uninformiertheit
Gefängnis für DVD mit 19 jährigem Pornoflittchen. Jeder Bürger kann im Gefängis landen.
- Brooke Shields nude: exploited pedophile magnet? | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Safe sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Shrink 4 men: feeling emotions of men victimized by spouses and biased laws | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- “Watching child porn victimizes the child”. The Voodoo science of child pornography laws and women’s studies. | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Bin Laden could face 25 years for child pornography if he doesn’t have proof of age for all his porn girls | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Bin Laden Could Have Faced 25 Years for Child Pornography if He Didn’t Have Proof of age for All His Porn Girls
- The Oregon Senate Bill Requiring Computer Technicians to Report Child Pornography Will Cause Unnecessary Suffering
- Child Porn Laws Victimize Children and Adults

#1 von admin am 05:21 - 05:21
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
0
I posted this in response to a good article here
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2010/04/24/for-a-good-time-call-little-lupe.aspx?ref=rss
This is so scary and absurd.
All due process is suspended. A real witch hunt. Spreading terror.
I appreciate all your comments, your rightful indignation about prosecuting innocent people.
Imagine if the Video contained 5 dozen young Russian 19 year olds. Would they all have to fly in? And a home made video, where one cannot locate the actor?
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/any-innocent-can-go2-jail4-childporn-carlos-alfredo-simon-timmermann
Interestingly, the world has been brainwashed so much that the real deeper issues are already taboo and nobody mentions them:
Let us suppose Timmermann had REAL adolescent porn. 14 year olds who already have babies and have sex every day with each other, made a movie with their cell phone. So for possession of that one should go to jail for 20 years? To protect whom and what? Anyone had been damaged?
Let us suppose Timmermann had REAL child porn of the worst kind. 5 year olds playing with sexual organs or getting penetrated. The REAL stuff.
So what if he got it inadvertently. Did not even look at the DVD. The DVD was mislabeled. Does he deserve 20 years in jail?
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/lynching-adolescent-video-is-legal-but-nude-adolescent-photos-felony-crime
Now let us assume, he is a REAL PERVERT. He enjoys watching this tasteless abusive stuff.
What damage gets done by him watching abuse photos taken 30 years ago? Why don’t they persecute the abuser? Have you ever searched the internet for movies about child lynching, toddler beating, etc? Not only Hollywood movies glorify violent justice illegally dished out by the hero.
In the above link you see a few examples of youtube and fox news toddler abuse and a gang beating a 16 year old to death. Why is owning videos of beating a 16 year old to death legal? But owning videos of a 16 year old having sex with his 15 year old girlfriend (which he does anyway, and which is legal) is a heinous crime punishable by 20 years in jail? All these laws stem from a witch hunt mentality that unfortunately has taken over the world, up to the United Nations.
more here
http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt
==============
Actually, as this is read by lawyers: I wish someone prosecuted people for possession of “Blue Lagoon” videos. Prosecute Hollywood Studios, Video Stores, Youtube.
Blue Lagoon clearly fulfills all criteria for child porn. Underage actors simulating sex acts intended to depict underage people having sex.
Maybe this law suit would wake up the silent majority. If they notice that EVERYONE can be a victim of this witch hunt.
#2 von roman guy am 09:58 - 09:58
Like or Dislike:
3
0
Disturbing article about Little Lupe incident. Great she testified.
My blog documents changing attitudes by mainstream men’s magazine publishers over the decades. It is a work in progress that is mostly sorting through material for a book.
#3 von roman guy am 10:07 - 10:07
Like or Dislike:
3
0
This change in laws and enforcement about text and images of minors (or NOT) wasn’t sudden, as you know. It happened gradually, or at least with several major changes socially and politically. I am very interested to learn the history of the past few decades in order to see where we are going. Frankly, it scares me. IMHO, this is not about sex crimes or protecting children. It is about control, period.
girls-in-magazines.blogspot.com
#4 von Eva am 21:17 - 21:17
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
0
6
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
#5 von admin am 09:46 - 09:46
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
0
Eva, it is legitimate to want to protect your children. Always be careful. Especially about the very rare REAL predators.
But punishing people for a thought crime, for looking at a video, that is not how the law works in other cases. I have other posts here describing how it is perfectly legal to watch a 16 year old being clubbed, kicked, stabbed to death (you can find such videos on prime Time TV) but if the same kid were naked kissing someone, then it is a heinous crime.
Finally, I even voice a unpopular and taboo view: if 13 year olds who legally have sex anyway, would record the act and someone else would watch it, I really do not understand what terrible damage would be done.
#6 von christianPEPER am 20:24 - 20:24
Like or Dislike:
3
0
As long as there is a sex-crimes witch-hunt, no one is safe, even traditional married couples that try to spice up their love lives with a DVD. Just like the “war on drugs” has begun restricting alcohol and smoking in public so too will the drive to keep the children pure and free from sin. Is it really sinful to look with lust at a sixteen year old? Should the sinfulness of a man who possesses a nude picture result in 20 years in prison? How long before all of America is micro chipped to save the children from sin?
#7 von Jan am 04:25 - 04:25
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
0
3
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
#8 von admin am 07:57 - 07:57
Like or Dislike:
3
0
A beautiful summary of the warped logic of mainstream opinion about child porn.
So actually, people should get arrested for having movies of under 25 year olds.
I sometimes wonder why a 15 year old boy, statutorily raped by a 30 year old woman, has the maturity to pay child support for the next 20 years. And why adolescents have the maturity to have sex, but cannot film themselves or they go to jail. Well …..
I have written about this here
http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/watching-child-pornography-victimizes-child-voodoo-science
and here
http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt
Sometimes I wonder if I am really too stupid that I don’t get that logic.
#9 von Alan Vaughn am 05:31 - 05:31
Like or Dislike:
1
0
@Jan
You wrote at the end of para 7):
“I find it very ironic that this blog is designated under a site or title of: Human Stupidity. Seems quite fitting if you ask me.”
It fits YOU like a glove, because you are to stupid to eveb understand what is being said throughout the blog.
It’s people like YOU that gave rise to blogs such as this.
You also wrote in para 5): “it is due to the fact that there is scientifically supported evidence suggesting that the majority of people who are not 18+ are not psychologically prepared for the consequences of their actions”…
Where are this links to this “scientifically supported eveidence”??
At least everything the admin of this site quotes as being scientifically proven or supported has LINKS to the scientific reports that promulgate it.