Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Dummheit-Dogmen
- Assisted Suicide & Right to die
- Irrationale Drogenpolitik
- Kinderpornografie-Hexenjagd
- Kreationismus
- Men's Rights & Feminism
- Menschenrechte
- Political correctness
- Prostitution
- Rassen & Intelligenz
- Religion & Atheism
- Sexualität Minderjähriger
- Umgangsregeln – Gewohnheiten
- Ungesunde Lebensweise
- Verbrechen ohne Opfer
- Vorbildliche Lösungen
- Wirtschaft
- Wissenschaftsirrtümer
- Wissenschaft
- Drogen
- Humor
- Uninformiertheit
Beiträge getagged mit Wort-Bedeutung
Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court.
Verfasst von admin unter Men's Rights & Feminism am
"I-need-to-go-home" means "stop". ?And failing to stop in the midst of consensual sex is "rape". A boy who failed to read the girl’s mind and make the appropriate interpretion of her cryptic comments was sent to jail for "I-need-to-to-home"-rape or "can’t-understand-women’s-subtle-hints-rape".
It is none of the 20 types of rape, and different from the "5-second-rape" where the "Stop" was explicit and clear. So we are up to 21 types of rape and counting.
During consensual sex girl says "I need to go home" and "I should be going now". "No" means "No", and "I should be going now" means "Stop". Women like men to read their mind and understand their indirect speech. But failure to understand a woman’s veiled hint now is punishable with long jail terms for"rape".
In our modern language aberration, everything is the same: there is no difference between "forcible rape at knife point", taking 5 seconds to stop consensual sex when the girl says "stop" ("5-second-rape"), or taking 90 seconds to understand the deeper meaning of "I should be going now", all is the same: "rape". Our language is becoming more and more impoverished and is losing its precision and subltety, thanks to feminist manipulative language that sees only black and white with no nuances.
The 2000 case involved two 17-year-olds who had sex in a bedroom during a party. The boy testified that the sex was consensual and that he stopped when the girl demanded. She testified the boy kept having sex with her for about a "minute and a half" after she called it off.
The boy was convicted of rape and served about six months in a juvenile facility. The high court affirmed that conviction Monday.
Justice Janice Rogers Brown, while agreeing with the majority on what constitutes rape, dissented on whether the boy was guilty. She wrote that the girl never clearly said stop, instead saying "I should be going now" and "I need to go home."
Brown also wondered how much time a man has to stop once a woman says stop.
"Ten seconds? Thirty?" she wrote. foxnews.com
Freerepublic reports on the "I-should-be-going-rape". The comments of the Free Republic readers are enlightening.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Zum Rest des Beitrags » »
Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to ... » continues here »
"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape!
Verfasst von admin unter Wortverdrehung am
"Rape" means a dozen different things. They are not the same! What perfidy:
- "Rape" had a clear, well defined meaning for thousands of years, until re-defined by feminists. The re-defined "rape" includes half a dozen acts that formerly had their own names and were not rape.
- Then vice president Biden comes hammering that all these dozen types of rape are the same. This is deceptive, because most of his listeners imagine he is talking about true-forcible-rape, not about Swedish-broken-condom-rape, 5-second-rape, consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girlfriend-future-wife-rape, duped-by-victim-into-raping-her-rape or didn’t-get-consent-in-writing-rape.
- This purposeful politically motivated rape ambiguity leads to equivocation and misunderstandings. This must be intentional and can only be politically motivated, because everywhere else we take pride in defining terms clearly, succinctly, concisely and unambiguously. (other exceptions are the closely related definitions of consent, child,
Joe Biden: "Rape is rape is rape"|YouTubeVice president Joe Biden, praising the University of New Hampshire’s sexual assault policy, Biden said: "rape is rape is rape". |
Vice president Joe Biden said more stupid and patently wrong things on that day, but that is beyond the scope of our article. See: Are One in Five College Women Sexually Assaulted? (The vice president buys into the campus-rape lie.) He fell prey, or rather is part of the relentless feminist lie and deception campaign to bedevil men as rapists. |
Rape is not rape is not rape is not rape
Rape is ill defined, is ill defined, is ill defined. Dozens of types-of-rape
"A rape is a rape is a rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! What perfidy! Manipulative ambiguity is perfidy. Who thinks that all these are the same? It is an offense to victims of true-forcible-rape to conflate their true violent victimization with other kind of consensual rape.
1) True-forcible-rape (rape-rape)
A women gets threatened by 3 thugs with knives, dragged into the woods, held down, raped and beaten, while screaming. Dragging-into-the-bushes-at-knife-point-rape is the classical meaning of rape and is what most people imagine when they hear the word "rape".
This is the perfidy of the language abuse regarding the meaning of the word "rape". It is difficult to justify a long prison term and sex offender registration for kissing-underage-girlfriend-rape. See Equivocation | Wikipedia
2) Swedish-broken-condom-rape
In the Julian Assange case, the women decided to press charges after they found out that Assange had sex with both of them (revenge-for-for-being-cheated-rape). They used a Swedish law that sex without condom is rape. This gained so much power because the United States (where broken-condoms-sex is not rape) wants to punish Julian Assange for unusual and unprecedented publishing-confidential-documents-rape (see cartoon)
3) Consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girl-friend-rape
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Zum Rest des Beitrags » »
"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different... » continues here »
Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerd’s groping from sexual assault
Verfasst von admin unter Men's Rights & Feminism am
OTTAWA – John Reilly, a retired judge and Liberal candidate for the Alberta riding of Wild Rose, was forced to apologize Thursday for suggesting in a radio interview that not all sexual offenders should be incarcerated.
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff called an Alberta candidate’s comments on sexual offenders "disgraceful,” but said he has accepted Reilly’s apology and he’ll continue to serve as the party’s candidate for the riding.
Alberta Liberal candidate John Reilly apologizes for remarks on sexual assault
The "sexual assault":
she goes, gets into bed naked, he goes up, he’s thinking he’s going to be able to, that she’ll probably agree to have sex with him, he fondles her privates, and she wakes up and tells him to go away, and he goes away. They report it, he’s charged with sexual offence, he has digitally penetrated her,
Judge John Reilly interview
Most likely the defendant did not stick the entire finger in there but just passed the limit with one phalanx. Also he was ill advised and probably admitted the penetration before getting a lawyer’s advice. Of course, the women would always be believed anyway
Now this does not look like a habitual predator, the judge is totally right.
But, this is an example how powerful the feminist language distortion is. Call some behavior "rape" or "sexual assault", and the perpetrator is to be crucified. If you told it by the real name, "fondling the privates of a naked girl while sleeping at a party", that would not cause the feeding punishing frenzy in the interviewer and the populace. You can notice this in the strong reactions of the interviewer in the written and his aggravated tone in the audio transcript.
Former judge John Reilly’s interview with The Rutherford Show Transcript
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Zum Rest des Beitrags » »
Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerdR... » continues here »
17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses political manipulation of "child" definition
Verfasst von Devils Advocate unter Kinderpornografie-Hexenjagd, Wortverdrehung, Men's Rights & Feminism, Sexualität Minderjähriger am
The United Nations manipulated the definition of "child" on purpose! So child protection laws could be extended to adolescent youth without need to be voted again. Human-Stupidity.com found the smoking gun. Proof is on the United Nations web site.
Q – What does the UN mean by "youth," and
how does this definition differ from that given to children?The United Nations, for statistical purposes, defines ‘youth’, as those persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years,[...] By that definition, therefore, children are those persons under the age of 14.
It is, however, worth noting that Article 1 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child defines ‘children’ as persons up to the age of 18. This was intentional, as it was hoped that the Convention would provide protection and rights to as large an age-group as possible and because there was no similar United Nations Convention on the Rights of Youth. (www.UN.org)
The United Nations web site confesses, expressis verbis, that the language confusion was created so that childhood laws could be transferred to adolescents, without undergoing scrutiny and without needing to be voted for. The United Nations, on their own website, admit that this age definition was made for manipulative purposes, and in contradiction of their own age definitions elsewhere.
"Seduction of an adolescent" or "unlawful sex with a 17-year-old" does not sound dramatic enough. It is easier to get harsh laws against "child rapists". Equally, it is easier to convict for "child pornography" then for possession of tasteful "nude photos of a 17 year old". Just manipulate the language to manipulate the masses! And government, press, judges, jury.
For the past 2000 years, before feminists took over the United Nations,
Is it not strange that all these terms were diluted to create confusion? We will focus on how the United Nations manipulated the definition of "Child" in order to force the world to ratify child protection laws for adolescent youths. |
"If you look under 35 years of age, show ID to buy alcohol""If you look under 35 years of age, show ID to buy alcohol" read the sign at the supermarket checkout. For the supermarket cashier, it is "Better be safe then sorry." Nobody goes to jail for 15 years for selling alcohol to someone slightly underage. So to be safe, "If S/he looks under 35 years of age, don’t propose sex, nor kissing, nor possess nude photos of her/himMost people are unaware: Age of consent laws and "child" porn laws don’t just scare people away from "underage" persons. To be on the safe side, one should not possess porn with anyone that looks under 25 or 30, and not try to get involved romantically with anyone that looks under 30. |
"Eschew obfuscation" (avoid being unclear)!
Legal argument and laws about "child pornography" and "child abuse" severely violate this basic rule from from college writing classes English 101. Science and law also try to get clear and concise definitions.
To foster the political goal of curbing adolescent sexuality and erotic depictions, the United Nations leads the world into obfuscation.
Due to United Nations influence,
our language lost the capacity to differentiate between totally different situations
,,,people assume that a person labeled with possession of CP [child p ornography] automatically is looking at pictures of 4 yr olds having sex with adults etc…when the law actually is worded to where you could have a clothed picture of a 16yr old female and have it be considered CP… prisontalk.com
The following are all the same now.
|
2 year olds, 7 year olds, 11 year old children |
= |
15 y or 17 year old adolescent youth. |
 |
= |
 |
All above are "Children"
As a result of United Nations language manipulation, the following are the same:
|
Indecently fondling a 17 year old |
= | forceful non-consenting violent injury causing rape of a kidnapped 4 year old |
Both above are "child rape". "Non-consensual" sex.
And the depictions of both are the same. Child Pornography.
We think this is demagogic. unscientific. Purposeful misleading. Disgusting.
You did not understand that this is the same? click on "more" below and we will show you why, step by step
Furthermore we will also use medical science and developmental psychology to scientifically define "child" and the phases of childhood. In a subsequent post, later, we will critique the Copine and Sap scales for failing to differentiate between infants and adolescents, between consent and non-consent.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Zum Rest des Beitrags » »
17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses politic... » continues here »
Weibliche evolutionäre Überlegenheit in Sprachmanipulierung als Werkzeug für femninistische Sprachverdrehung und Weltherrschaft
Verfasst von Devils Advocate unter Evolution & Psychologie, Wortverdrehung am
Leider ist der Eintrag nur auf English verfügbar.
Change.org unterdrückt Kommentare: "Frauenrechtler" Feministen zensieren mißliebige Meinungen
Verfasst von admin unter Wortverdrehung, Sexualität Minderjähriger am
Leider ist der Eintrag nur auf English verfügbar.
Wenn "Vergewaltigung" ist keine Vergewaltigung. Sprachmißbrauch des Worts "Vergewaltigung"
Verfasst von Devils Advocate unter Wortverdrehung, Sexualität Minderjähriger am
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Zum Rest des Beitrags » »
Wenn "Vergewaltigung" ist keine Vergewaltigung. Sprachmi... » continues here »
Recent Comments