Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Stupidity-Dogmas
- Assisted Suicide & Right to die
- Child Porn Witch Hunt
- Economics
- Faulty Science
- Human Rights
- Inspiring Intelligent Solutions
- Intelligent Design (Creationism)
- Irrational Drug Policy
- Men's Rights & Feminism
- Political correctness
- Prostitution
- Race & Intelligence
- Religion & Atheism
- Social Rules & Habits
- Teenage Sexuality
- Unhealty Lifestyle
- Victimless Crime
- Science
- Drugs
- Humor
- Uninformedness
Posts Tagged rape laws
Rape and murder of males deemed irrelevant
Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on
The press decries systematic rape of women in African war zones while keeping quiet about the killing of even more men.
When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.’”
Women’s suffering emphasized, men’s suffering ignored. An evolutionary mechanism?
Women have a special talent to paint themselves as victims and engage men as "white knights" to help them in that endeavor. The even higher level suffering and plight of men is just getting ignored. Human-Stupidity suspects that this manipulation skill is due to evolutionary built in mechanisms that women learned in the gender war, to counter men’s superior strength. It is to be noted that the limiting factor for child production (and thus inclusive fitness) is the number of women’s wombs, not the number of men. As Angry Harry puts it: men are dispensable.
Women are always the victims. In rallies, women "take back the knight" at safe campuses, requesting safety for women no matter how drunk. Nobody mentions that statistically men are more frequently victims of violence and homicide. Women stress rape culture, re-defining rape to include ever more minute transgressions like 5 second rape (failure to instantly stop consensual sex).
Women, engaging the help of men, manage to raise public awareness about rape while ignoring prison rape. Prison rape is extremely violent, and often entails years of sexual slavery and repeated rape. Prisoners who "consent" to years of sex to avoid violence don’t even count as rape victims.
Media focus on rapes and other female miseries while ignoring male executions, worked-to-death laborers, tortured prisoners, and nine-year-old boy soldiers trained to kill and be killed.
An excerpt from Tim’s new book Loving Men, Respecting Women: The Future of Gender Politics
‘When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.’”
A case in point is provided in an editorial by Nicholas D. Kristof, published June 5, 2005 in the New York Times under the heading, “A Policy of Rape.” Says Kristof, “More than two years after the genocide in Darfur began, the women of Kalma Camp—a teeming squatter’s camp of 110,000 people driven from their burned villages—still face the risk of gang rape every single day as they go out looking for firewood.” Now, of course, this is an abomination that demands attention. It is also an abomination that receives attention. My concern with this article comes from what’s missing—at least up until the very end. “I’m still chilled by the matter-of-fact explanation I received as to why it is women who collect firewood, even though they’re the ones who are raped,” says Kristof. “‘It’s simple,’ one woman here explained. ‘When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.’”
Inside Story – The silent victims of rape | Al Jazeera Video
The United Nations, even in security council resolutions, explicitly excludes men and boys when they talk about sexual violence against women and girls. The United Nations spokeswomen squirmed herself out of the topic, distracting but not recognizing the United Nation bias against male victims.
The above movie focuses on male rape. it still ignores other types of violence that is selectively anti-male. It mentions that 20% of male combatants got raped, vs. 30% of women. It does not mention how many men got killed, nor that there probably are not many female combatants.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Rape and murder of males deemed irrelevant » continues here »
If mugging laws were like rape laws
Posted by admin in Humor, Men's Rights & Feminism on
Woman: I would like to report a mugging. Last year was drunk running around the street. I met a man who told me a sob story about her owing $1000 rent. He was very convincing. I felt so loving and caring that I just went with him to the ATM and gave him $1000. Now that I am sober, and after ruminating for a few months, I am sorry I gave the money and want to report this robbery. He deserves jail.
-
In a normal non-rape context, the receiving person might be asked to return the money. But never would he be jailed for robbery for accepting money from a lightly drunk stranger. Much less if she complained 6 months after the fact.
This post is not meant to ridicule true victims of forcible rape. It is meant as a reminder that, unlike in muggers, those accused of rape are not guaranteed constitutional rights of due process.
Alleged rapists are jailed based on unproven alccusations. Like Strauss-Kahn. This leads to suffering for the falsely accused. It also leads to waste of police time, and decreases the credibility of true victims of rape. It also encourages false accusations, see http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/
Officer: You are very brave for coming forward. If you were drunk and driving, you would be arrested, but since you were just drunk and stupid, you’re a poor helpless victim. What monster could have done this to you?
Woman: His name is Joe Smith.
Officer: Well, we will go to his place of employment and very loudly announce that he is under arrest for such a terrible crime. He will probably lose his job just due to the accusation. If he is well known, even though he has not yet been tried, we will plaster his face over all newspapers and news channels. Luckily our society is one which no longer believes that “innocent until proven guilty” hogwash, we now have a “let’s hang him just to be safe” approach to crime. He will probably receive death threats, abuse from strangers in public, and may even be forced to move over this allegation.
Woman: Wow, that is great for revenge. What about the trial?
Officer: Even though we have no evidence other than your accusation, we will charge him, as no further evidence is needed thanks to new laws. If he takes it to trial, he will probably spend 15 years in prison, and will be the brunt of abuse of other inmates. Most likely however, the 15 year sentence will scare him enough that he will plead out. He will be in prison for 4-10 years, then when he get out and be on a public registry. If he has children he may never see them again. He will forever be ridiculed by the public and in a sense be a pariah.
Woman: And if after he has spent 7 years in prison, you find out I lied?
Officer: The DA will probably not even file charges, unless there is clear proof you knowingly and maliciously falsely accused the person. This is almost impossible, because you filed charges 6 months after the crime. If there is absolutely convincing proof, or your confession, you will have to pay a $150 fine. If you have bad luck, we will sentence you to a year probation. We will try to keep it quiet, otherwise other mugging victims may not come forward. He may or may not be released. It helps us if he’s not because now our D.A. and police department can run around and show everyone that we’re doing a great job getting another violent, misanthropic criminal off of the street. It’s win win for everyone, and if he complains about how his life is ruined, he should just man up and get over it.
Woman: Oh no! But what happens if I want to report another mugging after you find out I have been lying?
Officer: Thanks to mugging shield laws, it can never be brought up at trial, you can put as many men in prison as you like.
Woman: Well, if that’s the case, then I want to report another mugging. Bob Johnson, the cab driver, had mugged me a few nights ago. I know that he had me arrested because I had taken the ride and didn’t have any money to pay him, but it was really because he mugged me.
Officer: We will drop all charges against you and arrest Bob Johnson immediately.
Woman: A year ago I reported a (real) robbery. I had been walking around in a bad neighborhood, flashing my money around and someone threatened me with a knife and took my money. Police officer Miller took my report and actually brought the case to trial. But Miller also also told me that it is unwise to walk around drunk flashing cash at night in a bad neighborhood. That is victim blaming. What sort of world is this where a woman can’t even run around drunk flashing all of his cash and become a victim of unwanted attention?
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
If mugging laws were like rape laws » continues here »
One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped. Others are not so lucky!
Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on
One in two rape accusations (over 50%) are false: Dominique Strauss-Kahn escaped the inquisition. Others are not so lucky. They get convicted, falsely. We wish we could say Dominique Strauss-Kahn escaped unscathed. But he suffered tremendously. He lost his job. Speculator could have made Billions, because the value of the Euro dropped due to his arrest, and other unexpected stock market irregularities occurred.
-
Have we handed lone rape accusers too much power to destroy the presumptively innocent? Power to change the course of world politics! The politics of the World Monetary Fund. French Presidential elections, the future or Europe and the Euro currency. All influenced by a lone woman’s accusations. For an initial arrest it does not matter how dishonest or mentally unstable the accuser (alleged victim) might be.
Let us remember the thousands of men that are less lucky then Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
For every Strauss-Kahn, there are dozens of men that don’t escape unjust persecution
One in two rape accusations are false. Like Strauss-Kahn, thousands of men are presumed guilty, jailed and smeared without due process. They can not afford to spend millions of dollars for bail, a dream team of lawyers, detectives, and their own guards for domestic prison as Dominique Strauss-Kahn did. We only hear of the few lucky ones that escape. The Jörg Kachelmann rape case in Germany similarly ruined a successful public man’s career, had a man spend months in jail, because of unproven uncorroborated accusations by a woman, who also was caught red-handed lying about important facts.
"Of course, if she is a liar, that still does not mean she was raped. " Yes, but in that case, she’d better bring a long a tape recording proving the act of rape against her clear resistance. In our legal system, where men accused of sexual offenses are presumed guilty until proven innocent, they have to provide proof of their innocence. In the famous Hofstra false rape case the male victims of false rape accusations were only freed after providing video recording that showed that the sex act was totally consensual and very different then described in the false accusations.
For every acquitted man, there are dozens of unjustly imprisoned victims of false rape accusations.
Now consider this, how many men take video recordings of their sex acts so that they can later prove the consensual nature of their sex acts? Can you imagine: for every man that can prove his innocence, how many men stay in jail and go to prison, upon unproven, wrong allegations of sexual misconduct? Remember: One in two rape accusations are false.
No wonder, that with such medieval legal practice
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guil... » continues here »
Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough to prosecute (Bavarian Police research report)
Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on
1894 complaints of rape and sexual assault were filed to police of the state of Bavaria in 2000. The consensus estimate of all responsible officials is that way over 50% of accusations are false. Even when accusations are very dubious, police still file rape/sexual assault proceedings with prosecutors. Only in 7.4% of the complaints (1 in 13, N= 140) they propose legal action against the accuser for evidently false accusations, when there is clear proof or confession. The results of this meticulous 320 page research about rape and sexual assault in Bavaria replicate a less rigorous study in Schleswig Holstein state in 1994/1995, where 7.6% of complaints led to filing of false police report.
The following 320 page study analyses police inquiries of rape and sexual assault, and how police forwards these cases to prosecutors. It is based on all 1894 such complaints in the state of Bavaria/Germany in the year 2000. It deserves to be translated into English in its entirety.
-
Police officials agree that way over 50% of accusations are false
-
Even highly dubious and unlikely accusations will be forwarded to prosecutors for rape/ sexual assault prosecution, and not for prosecution for false accusations. This is why statistics show such low numbers for false rape accusations.
-
Only 7.4% of accusers are recommended for prosecution as false accusations (due to clear evidence or confessions)
-
64% of rape/sexual assault cases dropped by prosecution for lack of evidence are considered false accusations by the police official in charge of the initial complaint
-
Thus 1/5 to 1/3 of all cases were identified as patently false accusations, by the responsible police officials.
-
Human-Stupidity concludes that false rape is under-reported at least 7-fold
Rape and sexual assault in Bavaria | PDF
Munich 2005
ISBN 3-924400-16-4
6) Faking of or false suspicion of rape or sexual assault
In 2000, among all events, that initially appeared to police to be a cases of rape or sexual assault, only 7.4% were were registered as faking of a crime or false suspicion. In almost all of these cases there is strong evidence of these crimes [of falsehood]. Cases that remain doubtful and unclear after police inquiry will be handed to prosecutors as accusations of rape or sexual assault. (p. 176)
Police rarely send prosecutors accusations for false rape or sexual assault. This seems in stark contradiction to the [high] frequency estimates (by officials and police responsible for sexual crimes) of such false accusations . These [officials] estimate that such crimes have a very high occurrence, but don’t have statistical research data collections to back up such estimates. One department chief maintains:
"All officials dealing with sexual crimes are in agreement, that way over half the sex crimes reported to police are fake. Many such accusations cause an assumption of a sham or false accusation. But proof is not strong enough to prosecute [the accuser]. (p. 177)
The authors explain, that even in cases where there are very strong doubts about the truthfulness of the accusations, police will only file an accusation of rape or sexual assault, and not one of false accusations. This is why the statistics seem to contradict the above "over half" false accusation statement.
Let this sink in. There are clearly more false accusations then there are true accusations. Police authorities from the Christian conservative state of Bavaria/Germany agree that most rape/sexual assault accusations are false!
The report makes clear that proof of false accusations is very difficult, absent a confession of the alleged victim. In all these cases, there will be prosecution for rape/sexual assault and not for false accusations, even if there is significant doubt as to the veracity of the accusations.
While the serious psychological and social consequences of rape and sexual assault have been the subject of various investigations, knowledge about the impact on the falsely accused is lacking. The data for our project do not permit us to arrive at definite empirical conclusions. [...]
When accusations are dropped due to lack of corroborative evidence and witnesses, then, in spite of very significant doubts about the crime description by the alleged victim [...] there always remains a residual suspicion because the accused can not totally disprove the accusation. (p. 180)
[...] adding 1754 cases recorded as rape or sexual assault for the year 2000, and 140 false accusations, yields 1894 transactions which the police initially considered rape or sexual assault. Only 7.4% resulted in charges of false accusations of rape or sexual assault. [... results in the state of Bavaria] correspond exactly to the results of a survey (without scientific rigor) in the state of Schleswig Holstein. For the years 1994/1995 it showed a 7.6% rate of shams and false accusations demonstrated "beyond reasonable doubt". (p. 182)
There is a 1 in 13 rate of obvious false accusations. (7/4%)
The authors speculate that under the assumption of a 3 to 10 fold under-reporting of rape, that would result in a 1 in 38 (3 fold under-reporting) or one in 125 (10 fold under-reporting). On the other hand, some of the cases passed to courts as rape or sexual assault end with a conviction for false accusations.
Human-Stupidity comment:
False accusations of rape/sexual assault are under-reported 7-fold
The above conclusions are false.
- First there is no scientific basis to assume 3 to 10 fold under-reporting of rape
- don’t forget, that police experts only report 7.4% false rapes in spite of strongly suspecting false accusations in way over 50% of the accusations. As mentioned, if in doubt, police file only for rape/sexual assault, even if they are convinced the complaint is false.
So there is an over 7 fold under-reporting of false rape accusations by police! (7 * 7.4% = 51.8%, which is less then "way over 50%"). Police do file rape accusations with prosecutors, even if they clearly believe the rape has not happened. And police do not file a false rape accusation, even when they are convinced that such a crime has happened. Probably they should file BOTH rape and false rape accusations at the same time!?
Clearly false rape is an under-reported crime. We need to encourage the victims of false rape accusations to come forward and counter-sue. As quoted in the report, it is the consensus that there are more false accusations then true accusations. Men’s Right activists can learn from feminists. They can demand the same treatment for alleged victims of false rape accusations as feminists have demanded and gotten for alleged rape victims.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough ... » continues here »
Paternity Fraud is Rape! Paternity Rape is worse than Rape-Rape.
Posted by Radical Masculist in Men's Rights & Feminism on
Paternity rape (aka. paternity fraud, "paternal discrepancy" or a "non-paternity event") is a life destructing violation of financial, psychological, physical and mental integrity of a man. The cuckold man is profoundly impacted by this heinous crime. Fraudulent cuckolding is comparable to secretly implanting the fertilized egg of her husband’s mistress into the womb of an unsuspecting woman. Or bringing home the mistress’ baby and hypnotizing his wife into believing that the baby is hers. Or intentionally switching babies in the hospital.
A cuckolded paternity raped man is much worse off then a women raped
The victim devotes his life, finances and his dedication, love and effort of decades to a lie. Not just the money, but his life’s dedication - to a cuckold child that has zero genetic relatedness to him (evolutionarily the worst disaster and failure)
- The cuckold victim gets raped by government, who forces him to pay for the cuckold child to the cheating mom. The mighty government takes the cuckold victim’s money by force, under the threat of prison, often even after he has proven not to be the father. Do you understand? Unjustly robbed and raped by dictatorial government, for life.
- There is no escape. Not even fleeing to another country because paternity claims are usually enforced internationally, and deadbeat dads lose their passport.
- Paternity rape is as bad as being locked in a war zone rape camp. Constant, daily, non-stop abuse. Suicide is the only exit.
The paternity rape victim gets raped, day by day, by a woman he trusts, by a woman that knows (or suspects) that her husband is not responsible for the child’s care. it is a persistent state of rape, sapping away the cuckold’s life energy and force for decades. It is truly life changing.
- Childless man freed after serving time for child support violations
- Houston man forced to pay child support for child that DNA proves isn’t his
- A father was forced to pay his ex-wife £100,000 so she can raise two children she conceived without his consent after secretly taking his frozen sperm.
- Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support.
- In Britain, men are threatened with years of jail for genetically testing their offspring. Germany defeated the jailing law, but testing is prohibited, can be done only with the permission of the cheating perpetrator.
- Paternity fraud rape is high treason. Paternity rape is a mean, heinous, abhorrent, abominable, atrocious, awful, evil, execrable, grave, hateful, hideous, infamous, monstrous, nefarious, odious, outrageous, revolting, shocking, unspeakable, vicious, villainous crime
10 best paternity reactions (Video)
Feminists dramatize innuendo, justify fraudulent paternity rape
Feminists dramatize minute inconveniences like cat calls, ogling, objectifying gaze, "elevator eyes" as if they were "devastating" "life changing events". Feminists created an entire sexual harassment industry (SHI) around such minor issues and achieved laws that violate fundamental human rights, freedom of academic expression in harassment legislation.
Men lose out because they don’t dramatize truly life changing fraud like paternity fraud and birth control lies.
Rape-rape (forcible rape) is much less traumatizing then cuckold paternity rape (paternity fraud)
- Rape-rape has only an hour’s duration,
- If rape-rape results in a baby, that baby is the victim’s flesh and blood. Only the father is not the father of her choice. In case of marital rape or date rape the father might even be one she would have chosen to be the father.
- After rape-rape the woman has the option of aborting the baby. Even countries that prohibit abortion usually make an exception for rape.
Female language manipulation language manipulation created 24 types of rape. We should add
- Paternity rape
- Birth Control rape: a sex act without valid consent. A man agrees to sex, based on the lie that the woman is taking birth control. Or worse, the woman damages the condom, or artificially injects sperm from a condom or from oral sex into her vagina. The inverse analogue, the 5 second rape, the man that did not pull out, has already been criminalized.
Free sex? OK. Fraud? NO!
I am a sex positive liberal man!
I think women can fool around!
In that case, just don’t marry! Or make a marriage contract stipulating open marriage!
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Paternity Fraud is Rape! Paternity Rape is worse than Rape-Rape. » continues here »
Actor Dough Hutchinson (51) married Courtney Alexis Stodden (16). Is he a child rapist?
Posted by admin in Teenage Sexuality on
Is actor Dough Hutchinson a child rapist?
51 year old Dough Hutchinson married a 16 year old child (yes, by law she is a child) . Do you think, that, before marriage, Dough Hutchinson never touched Courtney Alexis Stodden indecently? Because that would be a heinous crime of child rape and grave victimization of poor Alexis. Or if he chatted with her on the internet, he would be in violation of grooming laws.
She is 16 y, he 51 y (35 years difference)
Age ain’t nothing but a number – just ask 51-year-old actor Doug Hutchison. Hutchison, whose film and TV credits include ‘The Green Mile,’ ‘Lost’ and ’24,’ said ‘I do’ to 16-year-old aspiring country star Courtney Alexis Stodden on May 20 in Las Vegas.
While the couple’s 35-year age difference has already raised many eyebrows, the newlyweds insist they are truly in love.
‘We’re aware that our vast age difference is extremely controversial,’ the couple told E! Online. ‘But we’re very much in love and want to get the message out there that true love can be ageless.’ NY Daily News
The age of consent in California is 18, for sex law purposes she is a child. If Dough Hutchinson ever had sex with Courtney before marriage, this is rape. All rapes are equal. Nowadays, marriage does not remedy such heinous felony.
Courtney Alexis Stodden’s mother claims:
"Courtney was a virgin when she married Doug," said Krista Stoddden. "She is a good Christian girl. NY Daily News
If he just engaged in oral sex or indecent touching, indecent acts with a minor are rape too, at least sexual assault. Even if he never touched her, then he might have sent her seductive emails and thus run afoul of grooming laws. If he crossed state lines with the intent of having as much as oral sex with her in a state where it 16 is the legal age of consent, he would be violating federal law in the USA.
Even if he consumated the sexual acts only in marriage, it still leaves open the significant question:
- why is Courtney unable to *consent to sex, but she can consent to marriage.
- And why, after marriage, can she consent to sex?
We need a criminal investigation. This husband needs to be arrested without bail, the minor child needs to be saved. Obviously she has been brainwashed. Furthermore, it is just disgusting how an old guy like that can be with an innocent child of 16. We need new laws to outlaw such behavior, to protect innocent 16 year old children from such a marriage.
In California, any person, of any age, that has sex with a minor, is a child rapist and felon. Most ( teens have sex before 18 years. 65-70% have sex before they are 18. That means, the average teen gets raped at least once and one person should go to prison. So Millions of Californians need to be locked up in prison. The law is the law, and the law has to be obeyed.
Do you think our proposals are stupid, wrong, immoral? Well, stand up and fight for all these laws to be revoked.
Weakness is a mighty weapon for fragile feminist crybaby girls: The Sexual Harassment Industry
Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on
Sexual harassment started with quid pro quo harassment, (="sexual shakedown", extended to all relationships with power imbalance, added peer harassment (which "sets the stage for campus rape" ),, contrapower harassment” and closed the circle with grooming and electronic harassment, Thus Title IX, an anti discrimination law, went full circle to selectively discriminate against males and heterosexuality. MacKinnon: sexual harassment ‘ is done by men to women regardless of’ relative position on the formal hierarchy.".
All quotes from Daphne Patai: Heterophobia
Sandler also displays her gift for concept-stretching by declaring that rape is "the most extreme form of peer harassment" (p. 51). Could it not equally well be said that murder is the most extreme form of conflict resolution, and that it has the same effect."
Men can not resist female weakness & fragility. Women’s weakness wins!
Harassment-feminists dis-empower women
The SHI (sexual harassment industry) trains women to become more and more un-empowered, vulnerable and sensitive. So ridiculously weak, that for a "reasonable woman", innuendo, objectifying gaze , becomes a "devastating, life changing experience".
Weakness as a weapon
SHI never teaches women to become empowered. On the opposite, women get trained to be weak crybabies. It seems that chivalrous men instantly come to save a damsel in distress.
Shoop’s bland words conceal the reality of what is being attempted here, which is a modification of public behavior in accordance with the patronizing assumption that women always need protection from aggressive males. This agenda of social transformation is fundamental to all that the SHI undertakes to do. It explains why there has never (to my knowledge) been a workshop on, say, how to keep oneself from taking offense at trivial slights or innuendos, or how to respond to an unwanted sexual overture in a spirited way that ends the problem. Instead, the suggested (and, increasingly, mandatory) workshops and training sessions are designed to bring an ever greater range of behavior within the purview of sexual harassment regulations. Daphne Patai: Heterophobia
Sleights as small as touching a student’s hair or praising (or criticizing) a student’s paper are dramatized as "devastating experience" that "is life changing". Creation of a hostile environment by claiming, in class, that false rape accusations are a frequent and common occurrence was grounds for a harassment suit against a professor.
All quotes from Daphne Patai: Sexual Harassment
Female fragility:
cause to rescind constitutional rights & academic freedom
"We can’t lose track of the wider goal in order to defend some narrow definition of academic freedom." . And the predicament of young women caught in [harassments] relentlessly sexist system makes it a "false conflict" to set constitutional guarantees [of free speech] in opposition to harassment policies.
Such concepts as "merit, rigor, standards, and excellence" are viewed as code words to promote " discriminatorv self-interest" on the part of the powerful (p. 311). "Academic freedom" is it slogan touted by "white male faculty" but, she gleefully affirms, one now increasingly challenged by "nonacademic" folk. "To many," Hippensteele writes, "academic freedom is currently being used as it license to speak and behave irresponsibly" (p. 311).
Explicit "sensitivity training" creates "victims" to demand redress
Institutions must "encourage" the reporting of "sexual harassment activity"", so that "reluctant complainants", "victims" who fail to complain will become aware of their victim status and file complaints.
in the discourse of sexual harassment, I have argued, training in victimhood plays a distinctive role. I can think of no other areas in life in which putative sufferers require so much help in order to recognize the damage supposedly inflicted on them and have come to depend on such careful instruction in how to script the accounts of their victimhood. Article after article produced by SHI writers insists-and this in itself should arouse our suspicion-that people need to learn how to identify the injuries they suffer.
Sensitive whiny un-empowered women need special legal protection
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Weakness is a mighty weapon for fragile feminist crybaby girls: Th... » continues here »
What’s so terrible about rape? Rape is not as bad as it used to be!
Posted by Radical Masculist in Men's Rights & Feminism on
-
Rape consequences are not what they used to be:
In our modern technological world with abortion, DNA testing and birth control, rape does no more lead to unavoidable offspring, uncertain paternity, and loss of all-important virginity.
-
Rape prevalence is not what it used to be: Statistics show that forcible rape is on the decline (probably due to the availability of pornography).
-
Rape is not what it used to be:
Many of the modern 20 different types of rape are non-violent, not forcible and often even start out consensual, or are entirely consensual (were it not for the newly changed modern definition of "consent"). The utter linguistic and legal confusion in the watered down rape definition makes discussion of rape almost impossible. In spite of Vice president’s Biden’s claim (shared by feminists) that all rapes are the same, we still are not convinced that forcibly raping a 17 year old is exactly the same rape as consensual love making with the same 17 year old.
-
Rape is over-rated.
It is time to stop rape hysteria, to re-think the length of sentencing for rape, to stem the ever growing number of non-violent and even consensual types of rape, to reinstitute due process and constitutional rights for the accused. Rape has ceased to be a special crime (see (1)), we should treat rape like any other crime. This is not "rape apology", it is down to earth "rape realism". Rape is bad. Rape is wrong. But we believe it is 100 times worse to be paralyzed for life or have large part of our body burned and scarred for life then to suffer a gentle consented-but-drunk-date-rape for half an hour.
Read with open mind. Read first, judge later. Question your moral convictions.
We were brought up with feminist credo, reinforced by politically correct colleges. It took us effort to overcome our brain washing. It required reading articles and books to see the mistakes, the misleading wrong logic, the cruel consequences of feminist and religious dogma. We were not born nor indoctrinated to be "anti-feminists" (a label we can accept), nor "rape apologists" or "misogynists" (labels that we will reject as unjustified).
We have been warned of the dangers of challenging the central tenet of feminist rape culture belief
We are afraid most people will read this with closed mind. Knee jerk reactions and inner convictions warp people’s logic so as to confirm their long held belief. We are attacking rape, the central tenet of feminism, even holier then harassment.
This is far worse then Galileo Galilei’s disrespect of some peripheral topic in the Bible regarding planetary motion. It is like doubting God’s existence.
We have been warned that this irreverent post might lead to vigilante persecution of the authors, with trumped-up false accusations, with Interpol hunting us down for our dangerous politically incorrect ideas.
We have an irrational and probably unwarranted trust that dissenting people could discuss this article on its merit and try to disprove it with arguments and logic. Unfortunately, logic can be very manipulative and confusing because of misleading and confusing terminology (see (3) above).
Men are violently averse to rape, even more so then women
We are very aware then most good men are extremely averse to rape, "All men are rapists" is as unwarranted and unjust as saying "all women are gold digging cheating paternity fraudsters".
Men, as a class, loathe and detest rape more than women do.[...]
[President] Roosevelt declared without equivocation (and without explanation) that rape is a crime "even worse than murder" that deserves the death penalty.
That might strike modern readers as astonishing, but during the oral argument of the Kennedy v. Louisiana, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5262 (June 25, 2008), Justice Ginsburg offered an explanation. Ginsburg noted that the historical imposition of the death penalty in rape cases stems from a tradition "when a woman was regarded as as good as dead once she was raped; and the crime was thought to be an offense against her husband or her father as much as it was to her." Treating rape as akin to murder, and thus warranting the death penalty, did "no kindness to women" she noted.
The "legal" executions of men for rape, and the illegal lynchings for rape that President Theodore Roosevelt decried, were carried out almost exclusively by men. Against men. Indeed, as we relate on this site, the killings, the beatings, and virtually all the other physical atrocities perpetrated against men falsely accused of rape are carried out by men. The False Rape Society: There is no ‘rape culture.’ Period.
This is probably why man-hating feminists use female superior verbal manipulation skills to ever expand the definitions of "rape" and "non-consent", to con women-loving good men into joining the lynch mob against consenting-but-drunk-girl-rapists, consenting-underage-girl-rapists, and, falsely-accused-but-presumed-guilty-rapists. From there it is only one step to lynch the mean "rape apologist" authors at Human-Stupidity.com.
[Roosevelt] also warned: "’The mob which lynches a negro charged with rape will in a little while lynch a white man suspected of crime.’
Roosevelt could have never imagined that nowadays US colleges and the US legal system itself lynch white or black men alike.
1) Rape consequences are not what they used to be
Rape was terrible: reproductive and social impact of rape
Why rape was as serious a crime as murder
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
What’s so terrible about rape? Rape is not as bad as it used... » continues here »
Recent Comments