Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Stupidity-Dogmas
- Assisted Suicide & Right to die
- Child Porn Witch Hunt
- Economics
- Faulty Science
- Human Rights
- Inspiring Intelligent Solutions
- Intelligent Design (Creationism)
- Irrational Drug Policy
- Men's Rights & Feminism
- Political correctness
- Prostitution
- Race & Intelligence
- Religion & Atheism
- Social Rules & Habits
- Teenage Sexuality
- Unhealty Lifestyle
- Victimless Crime
- Science
- Drugs
- Humor
- Uninformedness
Posts Tagged crime
Rape and murder of males deemed irrelevant
Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on
The press decries systematic rape of women in African war zones while keeping quiet about the killing of even more men.
When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.’”
Women’s suffering emphasized, men’s suffering ignored. An evolutionary mechanism?
Women have a special talent to paint themselves as victims and engage men as "white knights" to help them in that endeavor. The even higher level suffering and plight of men is just getting ignored. Human-Stupidity suspects that this manipulation skill is due to evolutionary built in mechanisms that women learned in the gender war, to counter men’s superior strength. It is to be noted that the limiting factor for child production (and thus inclusive fitness) is the number of women’s wombs, not the number of men. As Angry Harry puts it: men are dispensable.
Women are always the victims. In rallies, women "take back the knight" at safe campuses, requesting safety for women no matter how drunk. Nobody mentions that statistically men are more frequently victims of violence and homicide. Women stress rape culture, re-defining rape to include ever more minute transgressions like 5 second rape (failure to instantly stop consensual sex).
Women, engaging the help of men, manage to raise public awareness about rape while ignoring prison rape. Prison rape is extremely violent, and often entails years of sexual slavery and repeated rape. Prisoners who "consent" to years of sex to avoid violence don’t even count as rape victims.
Media focus on rapes and other female miseries while ignoring male executions, worked-to-death laborers, tortured prisoners, and nine-year-old boy soldiers trained to kill and be killed.
An excerpt from Tim’s new book Loving Men, Respecting Women: The Future of Gender Politics
‘When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.’”
A case in point is provided in an editorial by Nicholas D. Kristof, published June 5, 2005 in the New York Times under the heading, “A Policy of Rape.” Says Kristof, “More than two years after the genocide in Darfur began, the women of Kalma Camp—a teeming squatter’s camp of 110,000 people driven from their burned villages—still face the risk of gang rape every single day as they go out looking for firewood.” Now, of course, this is an abomination that demands attention. It is also an abomination that receives attention. My concern with this article comes from what’s missing—at least up until the very end. “I’m still chilled by the matter-of-fact explanation I received as to why it is women who collect firewood, even though they’re the ones who are raped,” says Kristof. “‘It’s simple,’ one woman here explained. ‘When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.’”
Inside Story – The silent victims of rape | Al Jazeera Video
The United Nations, even in security council resolutions, explicitly excludes men and boys when they talk about sexual violence against women and girls. The United Nations spokeswomen squirmed herself out of the topic, distracting but not recognizing the United Nation bias against male victims.
The above movie focuses on male rape. it still ignores other types of violence that is selectively anti-male. It mentions that 20% of male combatants got raped, vs. 30% of women. It does not mention how many men got killed, nor that there probably are not many female combatants.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Rape and murder of males deemed irrelevant » continues here »
Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstrong, instantly delete dissent
Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on
| LaShanda Armstrong killed herself, tried to kill her four children. One managed to escape her grip. Jezebel-sucks.com is trying to psycho-analyze the poor woman. Blame Husband’s infidelityBossip.com even finds a way to blame the father’s infidelity for it: The serial cheater who berated his longtime girlfriend just before she drowned herself and their three kids in the Hudson River won’t face any charges in the tragic deaths Jezebel-sucks deletes dissent Human-Stupidity posted a comment on Jezebel that this is a psycho assassin infanticidal mother. We mentioned that feminists would not look for psychological explanations if the father were the assassin like father shot family dead. |
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy Armstrong, 25, drowned along with 5-year-old Landon, 2-year-old Lance and 11-month-old Lainaina. Only her 10-year-son Lashaun escaped the tan van turned death trap NY Daily News |
Of course we, unwisely, could not refrain from mentioning that if the father had slightly fondled the kids in wrong ways, they would not try to find deep motivations in the father’s past but rather want to jail him for 20 years.
(no, we don’t condone inappropriate fondling of children, but we think that assassination is a much more serious crime. See our teenage sexuality and child porn witch hunt topics)
River Murder-Suicide Mom’s Tragic Final Moments
Tragic final moments of the murderer? a multiple child assassin? What about the tragic moment of the drowning kids? And the grieving father?
Anna North — A day after a Newburgh, New York mom killed herself and her children by driving into the Hudson River, interviews with survivors reveal some clues about her emotional state — and the family problems she was struggling with. River Murder-Suicide Mom’s Tragic Final Moments | Jezebel sucks
Her emotional thought? that is the fist thing feminists at Jezebel-sucks think after a multiple child assassination. Pre-meditated. Even announced it on Facebook!
According to her surviving son, ten-year-old Lashaun, she told her kids "I’m sorry, I’m going to do something crazy," and "If I’m going to die, you’re going to die with me." But just before Lashaun escaped the sinking van, she grabbed his pant leg and said, "I made a mistake."
While your car is sinking you hold your kid by the pant legs to have a chat? Probably she tried to hold him by the pant leg so he would drown too. My suspicion is confirmed by the MSNBC TV report. Obviously she was not sorry enough so she would try to save the kids.
Initial reports made it sound like Armstrong had intentionally let Lashaun out of the car, but it now appears that he slid out through a window and swam back to shore,
No, she wanted to kill the fourth child too.
The newspaper quoted Ryan as saying that Lashaun’s mother held her children as the minivan slipped into the river, saying: "If I’m going to die, you’re going to die with me." MSNBC
It is the father’s fault!
It is unbelievable. We thought Jezebel was bad. It can get worse:
Epitome Of A Bad Father: Deadbeat Dad Won’t Face Charges Even Though His Restraining Order Violation Drove Ex To Drown Herself And Their Kids
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstr... » continues here »
Dangerous pedophile vigilantes cheer German Dad, 47, for castrating the boyfriend, 57, of his 17-year-old daughter
Posted by admin in Teenage Sexuality on
Helmut Seifert, 47, an ethnic German originally from Russia, was enraged when he heard his 17-year-old daughter was having a relationship with Phillip Genscher, 57.
He went to police in the town of Bielefeld where he lives but officers said they were powerless to intervene.
“The man then recruited two work colleagues at his factory and then went to the house of the victim,” said police.
“The man was forced to remove his trousers and, fully conscious, he was castrated. The severed testicles were taken away by the perpetrator.”
The man was close to bleeding to death but managed to call police. His life was saved but he remains a eunuch for life. [...]
He told police: “I received a phone call anonymously that my daughter was involved with a guy 40 years older than her. You said you couldn’t stop him – so I did.
“I saw it as my duty as a father.”
German man castrates teenage daughter’s 57-year-old boyfriend (The Telegraph)
This was republished here Dad, 47, in Germany castrates man, 57, for dating 17-year-old daughter (NY Daily News)
- Note: nowhere did the article say that the couple actually had sex with each other
- even if they did, the age of consent in Germany is 16, there is absolutely no legal problem
- keep reading to see the murderous scary comments by the NY Daily News Readers
- So a harmless man is mutilated for having an affair with a much younger but legal woman, and the good citizens cheer and want to join the lynching
Naomid
2:59 PM
Dec 13, 2010
Why is everyone calling this guy a perv?? He was DATING the girl, not raping her! If an 18 year old guy was dating her, would you call him a “perv”?? Remember, Charile Chaplin married his wife when he was 54 and she was 17, and they had 8 kids together and stayed married for 30 years until his death, and she never remarried and is now buried next to him. Is that being a perv? If anyone is a perv, it’s a psychopath who cuts off *****. What do you think that is going to do to his daughter? She is going to be terrified to get into any kind of relationship again.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=118502&start=80&tstart=0#ixzz18gndinDh
Interesting discussion among the NY Daily News Readers
Dangerous vigilantes
| Cheetaralysa
5:50 AM Good for him! as a father it is his duty, parents need to protect their children. a 57 year old man dating a 17 year old he sounds like a child molester. I cant believe most of your responses protecting this pervert! America has gotten soft and that is why our country allows child molester books to go on sale on Amazon.com! regardless of the statuatory age limit in Germany russia whatever the mind of a 17 and a 57 year old dont match. the father did what he did and didnt even give up his boys…i salute him. that pervert will be scarred for life, im sure he molested other young girls guaranteed. america stop being soft. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=118502&start=160&tstart=0#ixzz18gutleNJ |
kitty62862
2:02 PM Why? A 17 year old has zero emotional maturity; won’t for about 10 more years. There is no way on the face of this earth that man isn’t out for totally fresh tail. Do that to my baby, pray that I only castrate you. We’ve taught her well, but someone who is determined sometimes succeeds. There’s no way that relationship is ok. No way. At 17, you are still legally responsible. I called my husband to tell him about this. This is what he said: “You help me, then cut yourself a plea deal and testify against me” We love our daughter, end of story. It is not ok at 17. It is not ok under 25. Period. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=118502&start=40&tstart=0#ixzz18gh3mZdE |
| iluvbball
12:24 PM Good for him, at least this child molester wont harm anybody else’s child. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=118502#ixzz18gdgiW00 |
sadtruth
1:10 AM I don’t blame him for doing that to a 57 year old parasite. She may be a siren but she’s young and still much the immature adolescent. The old man ought to have known better than take advantage of this woman. He’s lucky that all he lost were his *****… Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=118502&start=160&tstart=0#ixzz18gvlxMlo |
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Dangerous pedophile vigilantes cheer German Dad, 47, for castratin... » continues here »
"Human Rights" protect criminals to the detriment of law abiding citizens
Posted by Devils Advocate in Human Rights on
A woman started a scuffle with a policeman over a jaywalking ticket. Then she resists arrest. Her friend shoves the policeman. The policeman, faced with 2 unruly women scuffling with him, punches one girl in the face and then arrests both.
Again and again, he [the officer] tried to subdue the 19-year old. But the struggle continued. Suddenly, from the sidelines jumped the girl’s 17-year old friend. She shoved the officer out of the way. [...] He closes his fist, winds up, and lands a hard right to her face.
[Human Rights proponent:] I don’t excuse her behavior. She was clearly in the wrong. But again, a force of a punch to the face is not justifiable.
See the entire video with transcript & subtitles
Human Rights seems to be mainly concerned with protecting criminals. People who are wrong. You don’t resist a police officer. You don’t shove a police officer. First you put yourself outside of the law, and then you look for protection of the law.
How does a police officer arrest 2 unruly women? If he maced and tasered them, that would be ok? He has to do a profound analysis, if the girls will escalate? How does he know if more people will interfere? Or if one woman has fighting skills, weapons? So a police officer has to take risks to protect the human rights of girls that are clearly wrong and that attack him!?
Interestingly, dictatorships do not have major crime problems. Nor do Brazilian shanty towns dominated by criminal gangs, or cities controlled by the mafia. Most smaller criminals can get subdued by rigorous law and order.
Devli’s advocate s provocative proposal
The suspension of due process, normal in alleged rape, child abuse and child porn cases, should be applied to crimes with real violence and real victims, where public safety is at stake. If simple unproven accusations would suffice to arrest and try bullies and street criminals, maybe public safety could be reinstated
.
|
Example: -> Pattern |
Girls shoving Policemen | Gang attack victim stabs attacking gang banger | Rodney King (Los Angeles,1992) |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Bad guy” does something wrong or illegal | Girls start scuffle with policeman, resist arrest & attack policeman on duty | Group of thugs attack innocent students. Already knocked down one victim. Attacks next victim | * Rodney King takes LA police on high speed car chase
* risking life of many innocent drivers and pedestrians on the way, * He resists arrest, resists handcuffs, and attacks arresting policemen. |
| “Good Guy” reacts | Unable to handcuff 2 unruly girls at the same time, policeman returns a punch to the girl that shoved him | Next victim pulls a knife, and stabs attacker in throat. | Police taser and beat in attempt to subdue and handcuff.
Rodney King keeps getting up. Police takes necessary measures to subdue him. Even if they were overreacting, how serious is that compared to felony reckless driving, parole violation and drunk driving? |
| “Human Rights” worry about the guilty criminals | Girl interferes with police work. Attacks policeman who is busy with another unruly girl.
Poor girl got a punch after attacking a policeman who, alone, faces 2 attackers |
A group of thugs attacks innocent guys with punches. A victim defends himself with a knife.
How unjust for the attacker to get stabbed without prior warning |
If police tells you to lie down and you get up, you must be aware of the consequences.
Even more if you are clearly wrong, drunk driving, parole violation and reckless driving on escape attempt. Poor guy: almost killed innocent citizens with his car, could have injured police officers on duty, and got some beating with no long term effects. |
| “Human Rights” don’t get concerned about victims, safety of society and law abiding citizens | Police should engage in half hour scuffle with the girls. If girls use weapons, or more people enter in the fight, tough luck.
If the girls escape and thus learn that it pays to resist police, tough luck too. |
Attack victim has risk his life
When attacked by a group of thugs, victim has to do a legal analysis of the case before acting. |
Safety of policemen is not important.
Safety of society against criminal reckless driving felons is not important. |
| “Good Guy” gets into trouble | Police get suspended, suffer inquiry. Press and “anti-racists” attack the police for doing their duty. | In this case the attack victim, a student, got 3 years 9 months unsuspended jail sentence! | Police suffered inquiry, legal challenges. |
| Either way, “good guys” get into trouble, even if they act differently | At other occasions, police may get injured for reacting too lightly or too slow | Had he wasted time with warnings, and not defended himself, he could have been knocked down, beaten to death. The attackers could have gotten out their (bigger) knives. He might have been attacked by the entire group of the agressor. | If police is too lenient, they may suffer consequences:
|
| The exact “human right” of the criminal | Attack police trying to arrest your friend and have the human right not get punched | You may knock down one person, attack the next person. You have the human right to be politely warned before getting knived in self-defense. | Human right to resist police, flee for an hour endangering hundreds of people’s life, continuing to resist, try to attack police, being potentially armed, not surrender to police. You have the human right not get beaten into submission until you get handcuffed |
| Sources of information | Video with transcript & subtitles | Prison for Self Defense Prison for Self Defense (2) Prison term length reconsidered |
Rodney King (Wikipedia) |
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
"Human Rights" protect criminals to the detriment of law... » continues here »
Nude adolescent photos: a Crime. Videos of lynching, killing, beating adolescents are legal Prime Time TV.
Posted by Devils Advocate in Child Porn Witch Hunt on
After showning examples on the unrelenting persecution for "child porn", let us compare child porn to crime videos.
Years of Jail for "clicking on child porn link". But lynching videos are legal & Border arrest & instant jail for owning DVD with young looking 19 year old porn star. Any honest citizen risks jail
.Depictions of violent child & adolescent beatings and killings are shown on prime time TV. Tasteful nude photos of adolescents are VERY illegal, a crime, a terrible felony.
Unconscious stupidity and taboos analyzed
Why different standards for clicking and linking to various illegal material
Would someone be sent to 5-45 years of jail for CLICKING drug or prostitution LINKS?
- click here for illegal prostitutes (over 18)
- click here to buy hemp seed legal in Holland
- click here to buy cocaine
- click here to get info where to buy cocaine & crack
But clicking on “Click here for illegal child sex” is a crime.
What problem is there in possession of pictures of lawful events, or linking to them
filming and photographing FACTS that happen anyway
- teenagers filming themselves naked
- teenagers filming themselves having the sex they have anyway and they can legally have because of similar age
- toddlers filmed naked by their parents
Nobody gets harmed, nothing illegal happens. Why are there enormous penalties for possessing depictions of legal non-violent events?
Posessing depictions of real sexual abuse like sex play with a toddler carries much worse then REAL physical abuse
Even possession of REAL child pornography of the worst kind, while in bad taste, does not warrant higher penalties then allowing REAL child torture. A mother got 6 months in jail for allowing and watching her boyfriend torture her 3 year old child regularly with burning, drowning, locking into the freezer …. The penalty for the real perpetrator and torturer (5-8 years?) is way less then the 20 years expected for possession of a DVD with 23 year old Little Lupe Porn
6-foot, 210-pound Piskorski spanked Noah with a belt, forcibly held the child under 130-degree water causing extensive second-degree burns and pressed the child’s hands against a wall heater until grill marks were burned into Noah’s skin http://dailyme.com/story/2010050800001108/oregon-city-man-convicted-scalding-beating.html#ixzz0nj4shULq
Normally the criminal gets punished, not the person having depictions of the crime.
Proof: see two videos and some pictures below, of maiming, lynching, mistreating real people. Nothing about the pictures is illegal, they were transmitted by prime time Television.
Why are depictions of sexual activities so much worse then depictions of killing children and violence against children?
(1) Whoever violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years, but if such person has a prior conviction under this chapter, section 1591, chapter 71section 1591, chapter 71, chapter 109A, or chapter 117, or under section 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual conduct involving a minor or ward, or the production, possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of child pornography, or sex trafficking of children, such person shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not less than 15 years nor more than 40 years. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2252.html
Would someone be sent 5 to 45 years in jail for for "production, possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of depictions of extreme violence and extreme physical abuse of a child"? NO! See examples below But there are jail terms for having 2 grainy low resolution photos of a nude teenager in a thumbnail database. That is a terrible crime.
Sorry for posting very tasteless violent pictures and movies, but I am trying to make a point. You may want to skip the movies
This link is perfectly legal
I would be jailed, instantly, and anyone clicking on it would. |
|
| very graphic, I suggest you do NOT watch. If customs catches you with the video, maybe you need to prove that the victim is over 18 years old? | |
| Whipping of a minor by the Taliban. Do we need to prove she is over 18? Otherwise the entire might of interpol will hunt us down for having a copy in our computer’s cache or trash? No, if it is violence towards adolescents, it is ok. But nudity or sex, that is a heinous crime. |
- One can show, store, possess, distribute a video killing a child (16 year olds nowadays are called children).
- If he were naked, masturbating, or making love to his girl friend, then this would warrant 5-45 years of jail.
- but a movie of him clubbed to death, that is perfectly, see below
Atrocities towards minors can be shown legally (warning: graphic violence) |
Verbal description of atrocities shown in pictures |
| Beating Death Of Derrion Albert,16,Caught On Video | Cell phone footage showing a group of teens viciously kicking and striking a 16-year-old honors student with splintered railroad ties has ramped up pressure on Chicago officials to address chronic violence that has led to dozens of deaths of city teens each year. The graphic video of the afternoon melee emerged on local news stations over the weekend, showing the fatal beating of Derrion Albert, a sophomore honor roll student at Christian Fenger Academy High School. His death was the latest addition to a rising toll: More than 30 students were killed last school year, and the city could exceed that number this year.[...] Albert was knocked unconscious when Carson struck him in the head with a board and a second person punched him in the face. Albert regained consciousness and was trying to get up when he was attacked a second time by five people, struck in the head with a board by Riley and stomped in the head by Shannon, Simonton said. |
Somali pirates rewarded with asylum in Europe
Posted by admin in Human Rights on
European jails look like a luxury resort to arrested Somali Pirates. After their jail term they can not be sent back against their will, instead pirates want to request asylum and then bring their families over. Exactly the kind of immigrants a country needs!
Human Rights, when overdone as a inflexible dogma, encourage crime.
Somali pirates embrace capture as route to Europe
Pirates captured after attacking a Dutch vessel have gone on trial in the liberal Netherlands and at least two of them have declared their intention to stay on as residents.
Geert-Jan Knoops, an international criminal law attorney and professor at the Royal University of Utrecht, has suggested that the Dutch trial might encourage pirates to surrender just in order to seek a better life in Western countries. [ . . . ]
“Life is good here,” said one of the defendants, named Sayid, about his experience in a Dutch jail.
[ . . . ]
“My client feels safe here. His own village is dominated by poverty and sharia [Islamic law] but here he has good food and can play football and watch television. He thinks the lavatory in his cell is fantastic,” he said.
Mr Ausma has told the Somali that he will be considered for a residence permit after serving his sentence, expected to be a maximum of four years in prison.
“He intends to send for his wife and children as soon as he is released from prison. He knows he cannot easily be sent back to Somalia. He loves it here in the Netherlands,” Mr Ausma told the NRC Handelsblad newspaper.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! More welcome mats for pirates in Britain and Holland »
Somali pirates rewarded with asylum in Europe » continues here »
Sexual Desire for Pre-Pubescent Children. The worst of all crimes?
Posted by Devils Advocate in Teenage Sexuality on
As child abuse experts point out, about 50 children are reported kidnapped and raped or murdered by strangers annually, compared to more than 3,000 children murdered by parents and other family members in non-sexual cases.
Most sex offenders, says one therapist who works with sex offenders in a state prison system, are “Gentle grandfathers who made one mistake in judgment years ago and fondled their grandchild.
At issue her is:
- Legal punishment for sexual “crimes” against minors is a modern witch hunt.
- Totally out of proportion to damage caused by it.
- Hysteria
- Purposeful confounding of criminal violent sexual crime against minors nearly or totally harmless fondling or consensual sexual acts
- any reasonable open-minded unbiased discussion or scientific analysis of the issue regarding underage sexuality is totally shunned, repressed, ignored, prohibited.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! More pre-pubescent sex apology »
Sexual Desire for Pre-Pubescent Children. The worst of all crimes? » continues here »
Pirates with Grenade Launchers Attack British Ship. Captured and set Free by Portuguese Navy
Posted by Against Irrational Unconscious in Human Rights on
Heavily armed pirates attack a British ship. They were arrested by a Portuguese warship (part of the same Nato alliance as Britain) and then set fee.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8030541.stm
Explosives and grenade launchers were discovered on the mother ship when Portuguese special forces boarded “with no exchange of fire”, Lt Cmdr Alexandre Santos Fernandes said.
“It was almost a kilogramme of high explosives. If used correctly it can open a hole in the hull of a ship and sink her,” Lt Cmdr Fernandes said.
“It is the first time we have spotted high explosives on board a pirate ship, normally they just stick to AK-47s and RPGs (grenades).”
The 19 pirate suspects were released because they had not attacked Portuguese property or citizens.
I really wonder if that is furthering human happiness, or if it contributes to more suffering, encouraging further piracy by the same criminals and by others encouraged by their impunity.
Recent Comments